• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Antibody Dynamics of 2009 Influenza A (H1N1) Virus in Infected Patients and Vaccinated People in China

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
PLoS One. 2011 Feb 9;6(2):e16809.
Antibody Dynamics of 2009 Influenza A (H1N1) Virus in Infected Patients and Vaccinated People in China.

Wang M, Yuan J, Li T, Liu Y, Wu J, Di B, Chen X, Xu X, Lu E, Li K, Liu Y, Wu Y, Chen X, He P, Wang Y, Liu J.

Guangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Abstract

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the risk of the recurrence and the efficiency of the vaccination, we followed-up antibody responses in patients with the 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza and persons who received the pandemic H1N1 vaccine in Guangzhou China.

METHODS: We collected serum samples from 129 patients and 86 vaccinated persons at day 0, 15, 30, 180 after the disease onset or the vaccination, respectively. Antibody titers in these serum samples were determined by haemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay using a local isolated virus strain A/Guangdong Liwan/SWL1538/2009(H1N1).

RESULTS: HI antibody positive rate of the patients increased significantly from 0% to 60% at day 15 (χ(2) = 78, P<0.001) and 100% at day 30 (χ(2) = 23, P<0.001), but decreased significantly to 52% at day 180 (χ(2) = 38, P<0.001), while that of vaccinated subjects increased from 0% to 78% at day 15 (χ(2) = 110, P<0.001) and 81% at day 30 (χ(2) = 0.32, P = 0.57), but decreased significantly to 34% at day 180 (χ(2) = 39, P<0.001). Geometric mean titers (GMT) of HI antibodies in positive samples from the patients did not change significantly between day 15 and day 30 (T = 0.92, P = 0.36), but it decreased significantly from 80 at day 30 to 52 at day 180 (T = 4.5, P<0.001). GMT of vaccinated persons increased significantly from 100 at day 15 to 193 at day 30 (T = 4.5, P<0.001), but deceased significantly to 74 at day 180 (T = 5.1, P<0.001). Compared to the patients, the vaccinated subjects showed lower seroconversion rate (χ(2) = 11, P<0.001; χ(2) = 5.9, P = 0.015), but higher GMT (T = 6.0, P<0.001; T = 3.6, P = 0.001) at day 30 and day 180, respectively.

CONCLUSION: Vaccination of 2009 influenza A (H1N1) was effective. However, about half or more recovered patients and vaccinated persons might have lost sufficient immunity against the recurrence of the viral infection after half a year. Vaccination or re-vaccination may be necessary for prevention of the recurrence.

PMID: 21347418 [PubMed - in process]Free Article

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21347418
 
Re: Antibody Dynamics of 2009 Influenza A (H1N1) Virus in Infected Patients and Vaccinated People in China

Under the "related citations" of the original abstract, is another paper "Recipients of vaccine against the 1976 "swine flu" have enhanced neutralization responses to the 2009 novel H1N1 influenza virus."

Why would a vaccine give in 1976 offer some protection in 2009 against the novel H1N1, but a 2009 H1N1 vaccine that was given about half a year back, offer insufficient protection against a current H1N1 virus?

.
 
Back
Top Bottom