• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Ann Transl Med . A rapid near-patient RT-PCR test for suspected COVID-19: a study of the diagnostic accuracy

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Ann Transl Med


. 2021 Jun;9(11):921.
doi: 10.21037/atm-21-690.
A rapid near-patient RT-PCR test for suspected COVID-19: a study of the diagnostic accuracy


Paul Hofman[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP], Jacques Boutros[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Didier Benchetrit[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Jonathan Benzaquen[SUP] 3 4 [/SUP], Sylvie Leroy[SUP] 4 6 [/SUP], Virginie Tanga[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Olivier Bordone[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Maryline Allégra[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Virginie Lespinet[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Julien Fayada[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Charlotte Maniel[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Jennifer Griffonnet[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Eric Selva[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Giancarlo Troncone[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Giuseppe Portella[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Thibaut Lavrut[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Richard Chemla[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Michel Carles[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Marius Ilié[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP], Charles Marquette[SUP] 3 4 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: Management of large numbers of reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reactions (RT-PCR) for diagnosis of coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19) requires robust infrastructures, located in dedicated premises with a high standard of biosafety procedures, and well-trained personnel. The handling of a "run-of-river sample" to obtain rapid reporting of results is challenging.
Methods: We studied the clinical performance of the Idylla™ SARS-CoV-2 Test (index test) on a platform capable of fully automated nucleic acid testing including extraction, amplification, and detection in a single-use cartridge to establish the diagnosis of COVID-19. The study was conducted on a prospective cohort of 112 volunteers with recent symptoms and an unknown SARS-CoV-2 status who came to free screening centers of the Nice metropolitan area. All subjects underwent bilateral nasopharyngeal sampling. One sample was processed using the index test, the other using the standard of care RT-PCR. Samples were treated blind.
Results: Most of the participants (70%) were sampled within 4 days of symptom onset. Forty-five (40.2%) were positive for COVID-19. No clinical symptoms were distinguished between SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR positive and negative subjects except anosmia and dysgeusia. Positive and negative agreement between the index and the standard of care test was 100%.
Conclusions: The Idylla™ SARS-CoV-2 Test is very sensitive, specific, rapid and easy to use in a near-patient RT-PCR approach to distinguish between symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative patients in selected settings.

Keywords: Coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19); SARS-CoV-2; diagnosis; reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reactions (RT-PCR).
 
Back
Top Bottom