Critteraid's Post
Critteraid
17h ·
Hi everyone,
We are now on day 21 of what has been an intense crash course in Avian Flu. There are still many questions we are navigating, and we want to share our experience — not as experts, but as volunteers committed to learning and sharing with our community. We are still closed.
This post is long, and we’ve included information on:
How Avian Flu is transmitted,
Guidance we’ve been given on navigating risks,
The challenges of managing sanctuary animals within a system primarily designed for containment in the commercial/consumption industry vs live out their lives in a sanctuary.
Updates on our peacocks.
We are not trying to be controversial. This is simply an effort to share information and experiences so that together we can research, learn, and improve safety for all sanctuary animals. If you disagree with anything, please know that we are volunteers doing our best — not professionals in this field — and we ask for respect in your responses.
While 21 days does not make us experts, it has shown us that there is a real opportunity to create new platforms for sanctuary-level guidance and solutions, and we are committed to participating in that process for growth in safety process for our animals.
For anyone who wants to learn more pertaining to animal sanctuaries, we will continue to share what we’ve learned. For those who understand that this is a journey and not perfect, thank you for supporting us as we work to turn this challenging experience into a learning opportunity for all.
Question 1: Is avian flu airborne?
No — avian flu is not airborne for the general public.
It does not spread through the air like seasonal flu or COVID.
You cannot catch it by:
Walking near a sanctuary or farm
Breathing outdoor air
Living beside a property where birds have been sick
Driving past barns
The only environment where airborne risk can exist is inside enclosed barns where infected birds are actively shedding virus into dust or droplets.
This affects only workers inside those barns, not neighbours or the community.
Bottom line
Avian flu is not airborne in the community.
Human infection requires direct, close exposure to sick or dead birds or heavily contaminated material. The general public is not at risk from the air.
Question 2: Can CritterAid volunteers who were exposed pass avian flu to the public?
No — exposed volunteers cannot pass avian flu to anyone.
Here’s the factual breakdown:
1. Avian flu does not spread person-to-person
Worldwide surveillance shows almost zero human-to-human transmission of avian influenza.
There has never been a case of someone catching it from:
Casual contact
Talking with someone
Sharing air
Being in the same room
Passing someone in public
For a person to infect someone else, avian flu would have to mutate into a human-transmissible form — and that has not happened.
2. Exposure ≠ infection (and none of the volunteers are infected)
Being “exposed” simply means being near an affected environment.
It does not mean someone is sick.
3. How are we dealing with biosecurity protocols prevent transmission
Volunteers followed strict containment procedures, including:
PPE in Coops
Footbaths & shoe disinfection
Restricted movement
Cleaning & sanitation
Everyone is cleared through Interior Health that was directly exposed to birds, as we are now past monitoring time frame
4. Just for reference and information to share: The virus cannot travel from an exposed person to the public
There is no mechanism for a volunteer to:
Breathe it out
Cough it into the air
Spread it through clothing
Pass it on in stores, workplaces, or homes
Avian influenza requires direct contact with infected birds or contaminated environments.
BOTTOM LINE FOR THE COMMUNITY
Avian flu is not airborne in the community.
It does not spread person-to-person.
CritterAid volunteers cannot pass avian flu to anyone.
The community is completely safe.
The Peacocks: Formal Appeal: Consideration for Peacocks
(I wrote the following letter to CFIA)
I am writing to respectfully request reconsideration regarding the euthanasia order for the peacocks residing at our sanctuary.
We have fully complied with all directives concerning our chickens and ducks. Veterinary appointments are scheduled for Friday to ensure humane euthanasia is carried out in accordance with current biosecurity and containment requirements. While this has been a heartbreaking process as these birds have been with us for as long as 18 years and have names, personalities and are very loved, we understand the necessity of these measures for the protection of animal and public health.
However, I wish to present relevant information for your consideration regarding the peacocks. These birds have been completely isolated from the lower areas of the sanctuary and from all waterfowl. They are not waterfowl species and therefore do not share the same exposure risk factors associated with avian influenza transmission in aquatic environments. Their enclosure is located a significant distance from the affected zones, with no shared food, water sources, or direct contact with other birds under restriction.
Our goal is not to challenge the intent of the directive, but to provide clear context that may allow for a science-based, risk-mitigated exemption in this case. We remain committed to full transparency, continued observation, and any enhanced monitoring or testing deemed necessary to ensure compliance and containment.
Like the ducks, these birds have been part of our sanctuary for many years and have not displayed any clinical signs of illness. But unlike the ducks, because of their separation of locations and protocol, we believe there is a justifiable and manageable path forward that would allow them to be spared without compromising broader containment efforts.
I deeply appreciate your consideration of this request and your understanding of the emotional and ethical complexities involved in such difficult decisions. Please know that we remain cooperative and committed to following all recommendations to ensure both animal welfare and disease control are upheld.
With sincere respect and gratitude,
We are still in an active investigation regarding the Peacocks as the CFIA has to cover their mandates as well. We do not have an answer to date if they will be spared or not.
This experience has also raised serious questions about the future of “domestic animals” and how sanctuaries can reasonably operate under standards designed for commercial farms. I am still completing the required reports on the peacocks, but this has been an eye-opening process—highlighting both what we are doing correctly and what is simply beyond our control. As a sanctuary, it is impossible for us to meet commercial-level biosecurity requirements for confined for consumption animals vs live their lives forever in safety.
In every other respect, we meet the expectations placed on us. This situation is a harsh but instantly makes us look at the important part we may be looking at in what does the future hold for all domestic animals. We do believe that we may have been put on this path to assist the future generations to navigate as we are truly left with many concerns and not alot of answers. We truly don't know what this means for the future of our sanctuary. This is not meant to send shockwaves but we have been given a glimpse of what the options to us and our animals are. Now as a sanctuary, we are unsure of what this means. I have more questions than answers but we will share. Thank you for the support.
https://www.facebook.com/critteraid...G1w2rVwFQqCnrQJM7CJscHZmsaeSjzYAMZFkZoRktJFRl