• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Anatomy of a demand shock: Quantitative analysis of crowding in hospital emergency departments in Victoria, Australia during the 2009 influenza pandem

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 24;14(9):e0222851. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222851. eCollection 2019.
[h=1]Anatomy of a demand shock: Quantitative analysis of crowding in hospital emergency departments in Victoria, Australia during the 2009 influenza pandemic.[/h] Sivey P[SUP]1[/SUP], McAllister R[SUP]2[/SUP], Vally H[SUP]3[/SUP], Burgess A[SUP]4[/SUP], Kelly AM[SUP]5[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h] 1 School of Economics, Finance and Marketing, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 2 Department of Education and Training, Australian Government, Canberra, ACT, Australia. 3 Department of Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 4 Department of Health and Human Services (Victoria), Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 5 Joseph Epstein Centre for Emergency Medicine Research at Western Health and School of Medicine-Western Clinical School, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]OBJECTIVE:[/h] An infectious disease outbreak such as the 2009 influenza pandemic is an unexpected demand shock to hospital emergency departments (EDs). We analysed changes in key performance metrics in (EDs) in Victoria during this pandemic to assess the impact of this demand shock.
[h=4]DESIGN AND SETTING:[/h] Descriptive time-series analysis and longitudinal regression analysis of data from the Victorian Emergency Minimum Dataset (VEMD) using data from the 38 EDs that submit data to the state's Department of Health and Human Services.
[h=4]MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:[/h] Daily number of presentations, influenza-like-illness (ILI) presentations, daily mean waiting time (time to first being seen by a doctor), daily number of patients who did-not-wait and daily number of access-blocked patients (admitted patients with length of stay >8 hours) at a system and hospital-level.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] During the influenza pandemic, mean waiting time increased by up to 25%, access block increased by 32% and did not wait presentations increased by 69% above pre-pandemic levels. The peaks of all three crowding variables corresponded approximately to the peak in admitted ILI presentations. Longitudinal fixed-effects regression analysis estimated positive and statistically significant associations between mean waiting times, did not wait presentations and access block and ILI presentations.
[h=4]CONCLUSIONS:[/h] This pandemic event caused excess demand leading to increased waiting times, did-not-wait patients and access block. Increases in admitted patients were more strongly associated with crowding than non-admitted patients during the pandemic period, so policies to divert or mitigate low-complexity non-admitted patients are unlikely to be effective in reducing ED crowding.


PMID: 31550288 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222851
Free full text
 
Back
Top