• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Analysis of relative effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines using an instrumental variable method

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Vaccine. 2019 Feb 8. pii: S0264-410X(19)30148-3. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.01.063. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Analysis of relative effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines using an instrumental variable method.[/h] Young-Xu Y[SUP]1[/SUP], Snider JT[SUP]2[/SUP], van Aalst R[SUP]3[/SUP], Mahmud SM[SUP]4[/SUP], Thommes EW[SUP]5[/SUP], Lee JKH[SUP]6[/SUP], Greenberg DP[SUP]7[/SUP], Chit A[SUP]8[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]BACKGROUND:[/h] Observational studies of the relative effectiveness of influenza vaccines are essential for public health decision making. Their estimates, however, are subject to bias due to unmeasured confounders. Instrumental variable (IV) methods can control for observed and unobserved confounders.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] We used linked electronic medical record databases in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) as well as Medicare administrative files to examine the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose influenza vaccine (HD) versus standard-dose influenza vaccines (SD) in preventing hospitalizations among VHA-enrolled Veterans ≥65 years of age during 5 influenza seasons (2010-2011 through 2014-2015). Using multivariable IV Poisson regression modeling to address unmeasured confounding and bias, we analyzed the data by each season and through longitudinal analysis of all five seasons.
[h=4]FINDINGS:[/h] We included 3,638,924 person-influenza seasons of observation where 158,636 (4%) were among HD vaccine recipients and 3,480,288 (96%) were among SD vaccine recipients. Of the 1,728,562 Veterans, 1,702,824 (98.5%) were male and 1,299,412 (75%) were non-Hispanic white. Based on the longitudinal analysis of all five seasons, the IV-adjusted rVE estimate of HD vs. SD was 10% (95% CI, 8-12%) against all-cause hospitalization; 18% (95% CI, 15-21%) against cardiorespiratory-associated hospitalization; and 14% (95% CI, 6-22%) against influenza/pneumonia-associated hospitalization. The findings by season were similar.
[h=4]INTERPRETATION:[/h] Our analysis of VHA clinical data collected from approximately 1.7 million Veterans 65 years and older during five seasons demonstrates that high-dose influenza vaccine is more effective than standard-dose influenza vaccines in preventing influenza- or pneumonia-associated hospitalizations, cardiorespiratory hospitalizations, and all-cause hospitalizations.
Published by Elsevier Ltd.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] High-dose vaccine; Influenza; Instrumental variable

PMID: 30745146 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.01.063
 
Back
Top Bottom