• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

An audit of the reliability of influenza vaccination and medical information extracted from eHealth records in general practice

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Vaccine. 2018 Apr 28. pii: S0264-410X(18)30583-8. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.04.076. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]An audit of the reliability of influenza vaccination and medical information extracted from eHealth records in general practice.[/h] Regan AK[SUP]1[/SUP], Gibbs RA[SUP]2[/SUP], Effler PV[SUP]3[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] To evaluate the reliability of information in general practice (GP) electronic health records (EHRs), 2100 adult patients were randomly selected for interview regarding the presence of specific medical conditions and recent influenza vaccination. Agreement between self-report and data extracted from EHRs was compared using Cohen's kappa coefficient (k) and interpreted in accordance with Altman's Kappa Benchmarking criteria; 377 (18%) patients declined participation, and 608 (29%) could not be contacted. Of 1115 (53%) remaining, 856 (77%) were active patients (≥3 visits to the GP practice in the last two years) who provided complete information for analysis. Although a higher proportion of patients self-reported being vaccinated or having a medical condition compared to the EHR (50.7% vs 36.9%, and 39.4% vs 30.3%, respectively), there was "good" agreement between self-report and EHR for both vaccination status (κ = 0.67) and medical conditions (κ = 0.66). These findings suggest EHR may be useful for public health surveillance.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Influenza; Influenza vaccines; Primary health care; Surveillance; Vaccination coverage; Vaccines and immunisation

PMID: 29716772 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.04.076
 
Back
Top Bottom