tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Aust Health Rev. 2010 Nov;34(4):487-92.
An adolescent injury intervention: selecting targeted behaviours with implications for program design and evaluation.
Buckley LD, Sheehan MC.
Centre for Accident Research and Road Safety-Queensland, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, QLD 4059, Australia. Email:
Abstract
This article reviews the lessons that can be learned by the health sector, in particular, and the public sector, more generally, from the governmental response to pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza A (pH1N1) in Australia during 2009. It covers the period from the emergence of the epidemic to the release of the vaccine, and describes a range of impacts on the Western Australian health system, the government sector and the community. There are three main themes considered from a State government agency perspective: how decisions were influenced by prior planning; how the decision making and communication processes were intimately linked; and the interdependent roles of States and the Commonwealth Government in national programs. We conclude that: (a) communications were generally effective, but need to be improved and better coordinated between the Australian Government, States and general practice; (b) decision making was appropriately flexible, but there needs to be better alignment with expert advice, and consideration of the need for a national disease control agency in Australia; and (c) national funding arrangements need to fit with the model of state-based service delivery and to support critical workforce needs for surge capacity, as well as stockpile and infrastructure requirements.
PMID: 21108911 [PubMed - in process]
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21108911
An adolescent injury intervention: selecting targeted behaviours with implications for program design and evaluation.
Buckley LD, Sheehan MC.
Centre for Accident Research and Road Safety-Queensland, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, QLD 4059, Australia. Email:
Abstract
This article reviews the lessons that can be learned by the health sector, in particular, and the public sector, more generally, from the governmental response to pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza A (pH1N1) in Australia during 2009. It covers the period from the emergence of the epidemic to the release of the vaccine, and describes a range of impacts on the Western Australian health system, the government sector and the community. There are three main themes considered from a State government agency perspective: how decisions were influenced by prior planning; how the decision making and communication processes were intimately linked; and the interdependent roles of States and the Commonwealth Government in national programs. We conclude that: (a) communications were generally effective, but need to be improved and better coordinated between the Australian Government, States and general practice; (b) decision making was appropriately flexible, but there needs to be better alignment with expert advice, and consideration of the need for a national disease control agency in Australia; and (c) national funding arrangements need to fit with the model of state-based service delivery and to support critical workforce needs for surge capacity, as well as stockpile and infrastructure requirements.
PMID: 21108911 [PubMed - in process]
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21108911