• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Am J Trop Med Hyg . Effectiveness of Personal Protective Equipment against Coronavirus Disease 2019 Transmission: A Case-Control Study

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Am J Trop Med Hyg


. 2025 Jun 17:tpmd230270.
doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.23-0270. Online ahead of print. Effectiveness of Personal Protective Equipment against Coronavirus Disease 2019 Transmission: A Case-Control Study

Vikash Mahla[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Alpana Raizada[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Vrinda Goel[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Rahul Sharma[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Monica Lobo[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Dhawani Julka[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ashish Goel[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Several health care workers (HCWs) succumbed to infection during the recent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. In some cases, HCWs were even blamed for ignorance of standard operating procedures while using personal protective equipment (PPE). This case-control study evaluated the effectiveness of PPE in prevention of transmission by comparing attitudes toward use of PPE. In a retrospective 1:1 case-control design, HCWs who contracted COVID-19 infection were identified as cases and telephonically contacted. Those HCWs who were working in the same patient care area but were not COVID-19 positive before nor at that point in time when the paired case had tested positive were included as controls. Responses around the use of PPE were collected on an indigenously developed questionnaire on a Likert scale using a mix of questions. Those infected with COVID-19 (cases) were younger, felt that single gloves were sufficient, believed that full PPE was not as effective in preventing infection, and did not prefer using a face shield when in comparison with the controls who believed otherwise. The cases reported greater discomfort while using PPE and were more likely to remove protective equipment because of discomfort. The controls were more likely to be vaccinated and be following the WHO protocol for hand hygiene, although these differences were not statistically significant. The differences in attitudes and practices between cases and controls revealed characteristics that could be associated with transmission. Vaccination, improved hand-hygiene practices, and an emphasis on eye protection with face shields might ensure a healthier frontline workforce.


 
Back
Top Bottom