tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Am J Public Health
. 2020 Jun 18;e1-e2.
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305770. Online ahead of print.
No Detectable Surge in SARS-CoV-2 Transmission Attributable to the April 7, 2020 Wisconsin Election
Kathy Leung[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Joseph T Wu[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Kuang Xu[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Lawrence M Wein[SUP] 1 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Abstract
The April 7, 2020, Wisconsin election produced a large natural experiment to help understand the transmission risks of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). As of April 14, 2020, 1 551 711 total votes were cast (https://bit.ly/2yWPhlF),[SUP]1[/SUP] and 1 138 491 absentee ballots were returned as of April 21, 2020,[SUP]1[/SUP] suggesting that approximately 413 220 people voted in person. Waiting times in Milwaukee averaged 1.5 to 2 hours.[SUP]2[/SUP] Poll workers had surgical masks and latex gloves, hand sanitizer was made available to voters, isopropyl alcohol wipes were used to clean voting equipment, and painting tape and signs were used to facilitate social distancing.[SUP]1[/SUP] (Am J Public Health. Published online ahead of print June 18, 2020: e1-e2. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2020.305770).
. 2020 Jun 18;e1-e2.
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305770. Online ahead of print.
No Detectable Surge in SARS-CoV-2 Transmission Attributable to the April 7, 2020 Wisconsin Election
Kathy Leung[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Joseph T Wu[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Kuang Xu[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Lawrence M Wein[SUP] 1 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 32552029
- DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305770
Abstract
The April 7, 2020, Wisconsin election produced a large natural experiment to help understand the transmission risks of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). As of April 14, 2020, 1 551 711 total votes were cast (https://bit.ly/2yWPhlF),[SUP]1[/SUP] and 1 138 491 absentee ballots were returned as of April 21, 2020,[SUP]1[/SUP] suggesting that approximately 413 220 people voted in person. Waiting times in Milwaukee averaged 1.5 to 2 hours.[SUP]2[/SUP] Poll workers had surgical masks and latex gloves, hand sanitizer was made available to voters, isopropyl alcohol wipes were used to clean voting equipment, and painting tape and signs were used to facilitate social distancing.[SUP]1[/SUP] (Am J Public Health. Published online ahead of print June 18, 2020: e1-e2. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2020.305770).