• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Am J Ophthalmol . COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy and its association with altered presentation of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Am J Ophthalmol


. 2022 May 21;S0002-9394(22)00211-2.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2022.05.013. Online ahead of print.
COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy and its association with altered presentation of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment


Rusdeep Mundae[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Sushant Wagley[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Edwin H Ryan[SUP] 3 [/SUP], D Wilkin Parke[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Robert A Mittra[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Peter H Tang[SUP] 4 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Purpose: Evaluate factors associated with coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine hesitancy and clinical trends in primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (RRD) during first year of vaccine availability.
Design: Single-center, clinical cohort study METHODS: : Consecutive patients from December 14, 2020 to December 12, 2021 presenting vaccinated (Prior-), subsequently vaccinated (Later-), or remaining unvaccinated (Never-Vax). Primary outcome was proportion with macula-off (mac-off) RRD. Secondary outcomes included logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), primary proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR), proportion lost to follow-up, and distance traveled.
Results: 1,047 patients were divided into 391 Prior-, 252 Later-, and 404 Never-Vax cohorts. Significantly greater proportion of Later- and Never-Vax cohorts presented with mac-off RRDs (Prior-Vax = 44.5%; Later-Vax = 54%, P < 0.0001; Never-Vax = 57.9%, P < 0.0001) and primary PVR (Prior-Vax = 4.3%; Later-Vax = 13.6%, P < 0.0001; Never-Vax = 17.1%, P < 0.0001) compared to Prior-Vax cohort. Significantly greater proportion of Never-Vax cohort (7.7%, P < 0.0001) were lost to follow-up compared to Prior- (2.3%) and Later-Vax (2.2%) cohorts. Never-Vax cohort (median = 35 miles) traveled further compared to Prior- (median = 22.3 miles; P < 0.0001) and Later-Vax cohorts (25.45 miles; P = 0.0038). Prior-Vax cohort had significantly better (P < 0.05) initial (median = 0.30 logMAR) and final (0.18 logMAR) BCVA compared to Later- (Initial: 0.54 logMAR; Final: 0.30 logMAR) and Never-vax (Initial: 0.70 logMAR; Final: 0.40 logMAR) cohorts.
Conclusions: COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy is associated with worse clinical presentation and outcomes for primary RRD.

Keywords: COVID-19; PVR; RD; Rhegmatogenous; hesitancy; pandemic; proliferative vitreoretinopathy; retina; retinal detachment; subretinal fluid; vaccination; vaccine; vaccine hesitancy.
 
Back
Top Bottom