• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM . Outcomes of Pregnant Patients Treated with REGEN-COV during the COVID-19 Pandemic

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM


. 2022 Jun 4;100673.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100673. Online ahead of print.
Outcomes of Pregnant Patients Treated with REGEN-COV during the COVID-19 Pandemic


Natalie H Levey[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Alexandra D Forrest[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Daniella W Spielman[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Kirk A Easley[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Carolynn M Dude[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Martina L Badell[SUP] 2 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: Pregnant patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection are at increased risk for severe disease including hospitalization, intensive care admission, ventilatory support and death. Although pregnant patients were excluded from investigational trials for pharmacologic treatments for COVID-19 illness, the National Institutes of Health Treatment Guidelines state efficacious treatments should not be withheld from pregnant patients. Infusion of Casirivimab and Imdevimab (REGEN-COV), a monoclonal antibody therapy, was shown to reduce the risk of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) related hospitalization or death from any cause and resolved symptoms and reduced severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 viral load (SARS-CoV-2) more rapidly than placebo. In July of 2021 the Food and Drug Administration released an Emergency Use Authorization for REGEN-COV. Although pregnant persons were not included in the original trials, given the higher risk of morbidity and mortality in the pregnant population, our institution offered REGEN-COV to our pregnant patients beginning in August of 2021. Side effects after REGEN-COV administration are rare and thought to be secondary to COVID infection rather than REGEN-COV.
Objective: The objective of this study was to track the safety and clinical outcomes of unvaccinated pregnant patients who received REGEN-COV and compare these outcomes to a contemporary cohort of patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 and were eligible but did not receive REGEN-COV. Our hypothesis was that REGEN-COV administration during pregnancy is safe, and that pregnant persons who received REGEN-COV would experience less severe COVID-19 respiratory illness by decreasing length of hospital stay, decreasing ICU admission, and decreasing the need for oxygen and other COVID-19 therapeutics.
Study design: This is a retrospective cohort study of pregnant patients who either tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 or had a known exposure to a COVID-19 positive person, and therefore have been eligible for REGEN-COV at our institution. Within this cohort, we compared those who received REGEN-COV to those who did not receive REGEN-COV between March 2021 and October 2021 at Grady Memorial Hospital in Atlanta, Georgia. The main outcomes studied were perinatal outcomes, safety data and the clinical course of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Results: From March 2021 to October 2021, 86 pregnant people tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 via real time-PCR or had a confirmed exposure. Among this group, 36 received REGEN-COV and 50 did not. There were no instances of infusion rate adjustment or discontinuation, anaphylaxis, or death among those individuals who received REGEN-COV. One individual experienced worsening shortness of breath over 24 hours after administration which was classified as an infusion-related reaction. There were not any significant differences in perinatal outcomes, length of hospitalization, rates of ICU admission, additional pharmacologic treatment for COVID-19, or oxygen requirement between the two groups.
Conclusions: Administration of REGEN-COV is safe in pregnancy and did not increase adverse maternal, neonatal, or obstetrical outcomes. There was not a statistically significant difference in COVID-19 related outcomes in our high-risk population. Given the likely safety of this drug in pregnancy and its known benefits in the non-pregnant population, we advocate for continued use of this therapy and encourage the development of future studies to enroll a larger and more diverse cohort to explore its efficacy further.

Keywords: Adverse events; COVID-19; Casirivimab and Imdevimab; REGEN-COV; SARS-CoV-2; maternal morbidity; monoclonal antibodies; neonatal morbidity; novel therapies; pregnancy.
 
Back
Top Bottom