• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Am J Infect Control: Device-associated nosocomial infection rates in intensive care units in four Mexican public hospitals

Laidback Al

Well-known member
Device-associated nosocomial infection rates in intensive care units in four Mexican public hospitals
<o:p> </o:p>
Ector Jaime Ramirez Barba, and others.
<o:p> </o:p>
Background: Routine surveillance of nosocomial infections has become an integral part of infection control and quality assurance in US hospitals.<o:p></o:p>
Methods: As part of the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium, we performed a prospective nosocomial infection surveillance cohort study in 5 adult intensive care units of 4 Mexican public hospitals using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance system definitions. Site-specific nosocomial infection rates were calculated.<o:p></o:p>
Results: The overall nosocomial infection rate was 24.4% (257/1055) and 39.0 (257/6590) per 1000 patient days. The most common infection was catheter-associated bloodstream infection, 57.98% (149/257), followed by ventilator-associated pneumonia, 20.23% (52/257), and catheter-associated urinary tract infection, 21.79% (56/257). The overall rate of catheter-associated bloodstream infections was 23.1 per 1000 device-days (149/6450); ventilator-associated pneumonia rate was 21.8 per 1000 device-days<o:p></o:p>
(52/2390); and catheter-associated urinary tract infection rate was 13.4 per 1000 device-days (56/4184).<o:p></o:p>
Conclusion: Our rates are similar to other hospitals of <st1:place w:st="on">Latin America</st1:place> and higher than US hospitals.

(Am J Infect Control 2006;34:244-7.)<o:p></o:p>
<o:p> </o:p>
Credits juangarrison . . .
<o:p> </o:p>
Full article at: http://www.inicc.org/trabajos/200.pdf
 
Back
Top Bottom