tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Am J Epidemiol
. 2021 Apr 8;kwab089.
doi: 10.1093/aje/kwab089. Online ahead of print.
The Impact of Changes in Diagnostic Testing Practices on Estimates of COVID-19 Transmission in the United States
Virginia E Pitzer[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Melanie Chitwood[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Joshua Havumaki[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Nicolas A Menzies[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Stephanie Perniciaro[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Joshua L Warren[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Daniel M Weinberger[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ted Cohen[SUP] 1 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Abstract
Estimates of the reproductive number for novel pathogens such as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 are essential for understanding the potential trajectory of the epidemic and the level of intervention that is needed to bring the epidemic under control. However, most methods for estimating the basic reproductive number (R0) and time-varying effective reproductive number (Rt) assume that the fraction of cases detected and reported is constant through time. We explore the impact of secular changes in diagnostic testing and reporting on estimates of R0 and Rt using simulated data. We then compare these patterns to data on reported cases of coronavirus disease and testing practices from different states in the United States from March 4 to August 30, 2020. We find that changes in testing practices and delays in reporting can result in biased estimates of R0 and Rt. Examination of changes in the daily number of tests conducted and the percent of patients testing positive may be helpful for identifying the potential direction of bias. Changes in diagnostic testing and reporting processes should be monitored and taken into consideration when interpreting estimates of the reproductive number of coronavirus disease.
Keywords: basic reproduction number; coronavirus; mathematical model; reproductive number; transmission dynamics.
. 2021 Apr 8;kwab089.
doi: 10.1093/aje/kwab089. Online ahead of print.
The Impact of Changes in Diagnostic Testing Practices on Estimates of COVID-19 Transmission in the United States
Virginia E Pitzer[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Melanie Chitwood[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Joshua Havumaki[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Nicolas A Menzies[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Stephanie Perniciaro[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Joshua L Warren[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Daniel M Weinberger[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ted Cohen[SUP] 1 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 33831148
- DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwab089
Abstract
Estimates of the reproductive number for novel pathogens such as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 are essential for understanding the potential trajectory of the epidemic and the level of intervention that is needed to bring the epidemic under control. However, most methods for estimating the basic reproductive number (R0) and time-varying effective reproductive number (Rt) assume that the fraction of cases detected and reported is constant through time. We explore the impact of secular changes in diagnostic testing and reporting on estimates of R0 and Rt using simulated data. We then compare these patterns to data on reported cases of coronavirus disease and testing practices from different states in the United States from March 4 to August 30, 2020. We find that changes in testing practices and delays in reporting can result in biased estimates of R0 and Rt. Examination of changes in the daily number of tests conducted and the percent of patients testing positive may be helpful for identifying the potential direction of bias. Changes in diagnostic testing and reporting processes should be monitored and taken into consideration when interpreting estimates of the reproductive number of coronavirus disease.
Keywords: basic reproduction number; coronavirus; mathematical model; reproductive number; transmission dynamics.