tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Am J Emerg Med
. 2021 Dec 15;52:179-183.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.12.021. Online ahead of print.
Operationalizing influenza vaccination in an urban safety-net emergency department
Natalija M Farrell[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Matthew Lamb[SUP] 2 [/SUP], William E Baker[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Bryan J Gendron[SUP] 4 [/SUP], David Fett[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Nelson Figueroa[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Danielle Margetak[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Elissa M Schechter-Perkins[SUP] 8 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Abstract
Introduction: Influenza vaccination is a recommended tool in preventing influenza-related illnesses, medical visits, and hospitalizations. With many patients remaining unvaccinated each year, the Emergency Department (ED) represents a unique opportunity to provide vaccinations to patient not yet vaccinated. However, busy urban safety-net EDs maybe challenged to safely execute such a vaccination program. The aim of this quality improvement project was to assess influenza vaccination feasibility in the ED and improve influenza vaccination rates in our community.
Methods: The quality improvement work-group, comprised of ED physicians, nurses, and pharmacists, designed and implemented an influenza vaccination protocol that aligned with the ED workflow. The outcome measure was the total number of patients vaccinated per month and per influenza season. Process measures included the type of influenza vaccine administered and type of care area within ED. Balancing measures were also included.
Results: Following the initiative, a total of 337 patients received influenza vaccinations in the ED between September 1, 2018 and December 31, 2020 compared to none during the previous influenza season. With each influenza season, the number of vaccinated patients increased from 61 to 134 and 142, respectively. The average age of the patients was 48.23 ± 15.29, 52.89 ± 15.91, and 44.92 ± 18.97 years old. Most patients received the vaccination while roomed in the high acuity section of the adult ED. No adverse effects or automated dispensing cabinet stockouts were observed.
Conclusion: Our structured program indicates that influenza vaccine administration to eligible patients is feasible in a busy urban safety-net ED. Piloting new and further developing existing ED-based influenza vaccination programs have the potential to significantly benefit public health.
Keywords: Emergency department; Immunization programs; Influenza vaccines; Vaccination.
. 2021 Dec 15;52:179-183.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.12.021. Online ahead of print.
Operationalizing influenza vaccination in an urban safety-net emergency department
Natalija M Farrell[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Matthew Lamb[SUP] 2 [/SUP], William E Baker[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Bryan J Gendron[SUP] 4 [/SUP], David Fett[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Nelson Figueroa[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Danielle Margetak[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Elissa M Schechter-Perkins[SUP] 8 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 34942427
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.12.021
Abstract
Introduction: Influenza vaccination is a recommended tool in preventing influenza-related illnesses, medical visits, and hospitalizations. With many patients remaining unvaccinated each year, the Emergency Department (ED) represents a unique opportunity to provide vaccinations to patient not yet vaccinated. However, busy urban safety-net EDs maybe challenged to safely execute such a vaccination program. The aim of this quality improvement project was to assess influenza vaccination feasibility in the ED and improve influenza vaccination rates in our community.
Methods: The quality improvement work-group, comprised of ED physicians, nurses, and pharmacists, designed and implemented an influenza vaccination protocol that aligned with the ED workflow. The outcome measure was the total number of patients vaccinated per month and per influenza season. Process measures included the type of influenza vaccine administered and type of care area within ED. Balancing measures were also included.
Results: Following the initiative, a total of 337 patients received influenza vaccinations in the ED between September 1, 2018 and December 31, 2020 compared to none during the previous influenza season. With each influenza season, the number of vaccinated patients increased from 61 to 134 and 142, respectively. The average age of the patients was 48.23 ± 15.29, 52.89 ± 15.91, and 44.92 ± 18.97 years old. Most patients received the vaccination while roomed in the high acuity section of the adult ED. No adverse effects or automated dispensing cabinet stockouts were observed.
Conclusion: Our structured program indicates that influenza vaccine administration to eligible patients is feasible in a busy urban safety-net ED. Piloting new and further developing existing ED-based influenza vaccination programs have the potential to significantly benefit public health.
Keywords: Emergency department; Immunization programs; Influenza vaccines; Vaccination.