Gert van der Hoek
In Memoriam - Editor, Senior Moderator
The cause of Alzheimer's disease is poorly understood.The disease process is associated with plaques and tangles in the brain. A probable diagnosis is based on the history of the illness and cognitive testing with medical imaging and blood tests to rule out other possible causes. Initial symptoms are often mistaken for normal ageing. Examination of brain tissue is needed for a definite diagnosis. Currently no treatment is available.
Mainstream science is focussing on amyloid plaques and tau proteines as a possible cause. Some mavericks point to mitochondrial dysfuncion as a trigger for development of AD. Until now all drug trials related to the amyloid hypthesis have failed, despite huge investments. Hardly any funding for trials working with the mitochondrial hypothesis.
Swerdlow c.s. defend the mitochondrial hypothesis. In their paper published in 2013, they explain the current state of both hypotheses.
The Alzheimer's Disease Mitochondrial Cascade Hypothesis: Progress and Perspectives
Abstract
Ten years ago we first proposed the Alzheimer's disease (AD) mitochondrial cascade hypothesis. This hypothesis maintains gene inheritance defines an individual's baseline mitochondrial function; inherited and environmental factors determine rates at which mitochondrial function changes over time; and baseline mitochondrial function and mitochondrial change rates influence AD chronology. Our hypothesis unequivocally states in sporadic, late-onset AD, mitochondrial function affects amyloid precursor protein (APP) expression, APP processing, or beta amyloid (Aβ) accumulation and argues if an amyloid cascade truly exists, mitochondrial function triggers it.
We now review the state of the mitochondrial cascade hypothesis, and discuss it in the context of recent AD biomarker studies, diagnostic criteria, and clinical trials. Our hypothesis predicts biomarker changes reflect brain aging, new AD definitions clinically stage brain aging, and removing brain Aβ at any point will marginally impact cognitive trajectories. Our hypothesis, therefore, offers unique perspective into what sporadic, late-onset AD is and how to best treat it.
LINK TO FULL ARTICLE
Mainstream science is focussing on amyloid plaques and tau proteines as a possible cause. Some mavericks point to mitochondrial dysfuncion as a trigger for development of AD. Until now all drug trials related to the amyloid hypthesis have failed, despite huge investments. Hardly any funding for trials working with the mitochondrial hypothesis.
Swerdlow c.s. defend the mitochondrial hypothesis. In their paper published in 2013, they explain the current state of both hypotheses.
The Alzheimer's Disease Mitochondrial Cascade Hypothesis: Progress and Perspectives
Abstract
Ten years ago we first proposed the Alzheimer's disease (AD) mitochondrial cascade hypothesis. This hypothesis maintains gene inheritance defines an individual's baseline mitochondrial function; inherited and environmental factors determine rates at which mitochondrial function changes over time; and baseline mitochondrial function and mitochondrial change rates influence AD chronology. Our hypothesis unequivocally states in sporadic, late-onset AD, mitochondrial function affects amyloid precursor protein (APP) expression, APP processing, or beta amyloid (Aβ) accumulation and argues if an amyloid cascade truly exists, mitochondrial function triggers it.
We now review the state of the mitochondrial cascade hypothesis, and discuss it in the context of recent AD biomarker studies, diagnostic criteria, and clinical trials. Our hypothesis predicts biomarker changes reflect brain aging, new AD definitions clinically stage brain aging, and removing brain Aβ at any point will marginally impact cognitive trajectories. Our hypothesis, therefore, offers unique perspective into what sporadic, late-onset AD is and how to best treat it.
LINK TO FULL ARTICLE
Last edited: