• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. Diagnostic Tools for Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19): Comparing CT and RT-PCR Viral Nucleic Acid Testing

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 May 15:1-5. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.23418. [Epub ahead of print]
Diagnostic Tools for Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19): Comparing CT and RT-PCR Viral Nucleic Acid Testing.


Waller JV[SUP]1[/SUP], Kaur P[SUP]2[/SUP], Tucker A[SUP]3[/SUP], Lin KK[SUP]4[/SUP], Diaz MJ[SUP]5[/SUP], Henry TS[SUP]6[/SUP], Hope M[SUP]6[/SUP].

Author information




Abstract

OBJECTIVE. Multiple studies suggest CT should be a primary diagnostic tool for coronavirus disease (COVID-19) because they reported sensitivities with CT far superior to that of reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing. This review aimed to assess these reports and found chest CT to have a clinical utility that is limited, particularly for patients who show no symptoms and patients who are screened early in disease progression. CONCLUSION. CT has limited sensitivity for COVID-19 and a lower specificity than RT-PCR testing, and it carries a risk of exposing providers to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Chest CT should be considered a supplemental diagnostic tool, particularly for patients who show symptoms.



KEYWORDS:

COVID-19; RT-PCR; SARS-CoV-2; chest CT; coronavirus disease; sensitivity; severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; specificity


PMID:32412790DOI:10.2214/AJR.20.23418
 
Back
Top