• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Aging (Albany NY) . Evaluation of droplet digital PCR for quantification of SARS-CoV-2 Virus in discharged COVID-19 patients

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Aging (Albany NY)


. 2020 Nov 1;12.
doi: 10.18632/aging.104020. Online ahead of print.
Evaluation of droplet digital PCR for quantification of SARS-CoV-2 Virus in discharged COVID-19 patients


Chong Liu[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Qingxin Shi[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Mingfei Peng[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ruyue Lu[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Haohao Li[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Yingying Cai[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jiaxi Chen[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jiaqin Xu[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Bo Shen[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Free article

Abstract

The worldwide severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) outbreak has led to the rapid spread of coronavirus disease (COVID-19). The quantitative real time PCR (qPCR) is widely used as the gold standard for clinical detection of SARS-CoV-2. However, more and more infected patients are relapsing after discharge, which suggests qPCR may fail to detect the virus in some cases. In this study, we selected 74 clinical samples from 43 recovering inpatients for qPCR and Droplet Digital PCR (ddPCR) synchronous blind detection, and established a cutoff value for ddPCR diagnosis of COVID-19. The results showed that at a cutoff value of 0.04 copies/μL, the ddPCR sensitivity and specificity are 97.6% and 100%, respectively. In addition, we also analyzed 18 retained samples from 9 discharged patients who relapsed. Although qPCR showed all 18 samples to be negative, ddPCR showed 12 to be positive, and there was only one patient with two negative samples; the other eight patients had at least one positive sample. These results indicate that ddPCR could significantly improve the accuracy of COVID-19 diagnosis, especially for discharged patients with a low viral load, and help to reduce misdiagnosis during recovery.

Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; discharged criteria; droplet digital PCR.
 
Back
Top Bottom