• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Aerosol transmission of an avian influenza H9N2 virus with a tropism for the respiratory tract of chickens

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Avian Dis. 2013 Sep;57(3):645-9.
Aerosol transmission of an avian influenza H9N2 virus with a tropism for the respiratory tract of chickens.
Guan J, Fu Q, Chan M, Spencer JL.
Source

Ottawa Laboratory (Fallowfield), Canadian Food Inspection Agency, 3851 Fallowfield Road, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K2H 8P9. Jiewen.Guan@inspection.gc.ca
Abstract

A low pathogenic avian influenza virus (LPAI H9N2) was administered to 3-wk-old chickens by aerosol exposure, intranasal inoculation, and by oral inoculation. Tests for virus were by in ovo assay and by real-time reverse-transcriptase PCR. The aerosol dosage was determined by aerosolizing virus into a chamber when it was empty and when it contained chickens. Air was collected and the amount of virus inhaled was estimated to be about 18% of the total body uptake. In transmission studies, tests for virus were conducted on oropharyngeal or cloacal swabs. The 50% infectious dose (ID50) for aerosolized virus was about 2 log 10 and 5 log 10 lower than by nasal or oral inoculation, respectively. The recovery rate was higher from swabs of the oropharyngeal region than from the cloacal region (P < 0.05). For horizontal transmission studies, uninfected chickens were held in isolators with seeders that had been inoculated intranasally with the H9N2 virus. Chickens exposed by indirect contact were separated by screens from the seeders. In another isolator those directly exposed were intermingled with the seeders. During the 10-day test period, none of the chickens developed symptoms of disease, but infection was detected as early as 4 and 7 days in the indirectly and directly exposed groups, respectively. These findings suggested that aerosol transmission of viruses similar to LPAI H9N2 could efficiently occur, at least over short distances.

PMID:
24283131
[PubMed - in process]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24283131
 
Back
Top Bottom