tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Front Public Health. 2018 Jun 14;6:174. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00174. eCollection 2018.
[h=1]Aerosol Sampling in a Hospital Emergency Room Setting: A Complementary Surveillance Method for the Detection of Respiratory Viruses.[/h] Choi JY[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP], Zemke J[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP], Philo SE[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP], Bailey ES[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP], Yondon M[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP], Gray GC[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2,[/SUP][SUP]3,[/SUP][SUP]4[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]
[h=3]Abstract[/h] This study aimed to evaluate environmental air sampling as an alternative form of active surveillance for respiratory pathogens in clinical settings. Samples were collected from three locations in the Emergency Department at Duke University Hospital Systems from October 2017 to March 2018. Of the 44 samples collected, 12 were positive for known respiratory pathogens including influenza A, influenza D, and adenovirus. Results suggest bioaerosol sampling may serve as a complement to active surveillance in clinical settings. Additionally, since respiratory viruses were detected in aerosol samples, our results suggest that hospital infection control measures, including the use of N95 respirators, could be used to limit the spread of infectious viruses in the air.
[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] bioaerosol sampling; emergency service; epidemiology; hospital; infectious aerosols; respiratory viruses
PMID: 29963543 PMCID: PMC6011129 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00174
Free full text
[h=1]Aerosol Sampling in a Hospital Emergency Room Setting: A Complementary Surveillance Method for the Detection of Respiratory Viruses.[/h] Choi JY[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP], Zemke J[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP], Philo SE[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP], Bailey ES[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP], Yondon M[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP], Gray GC[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2,[/SUP][SUP]3,[/SUP][SUP]4[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]
[h=3]Abstract[/h] This study aimed to evaluate environmental air sampling as an alternative form of active surveillance for respiratory pathogens in clinical settings. Samples were collected from three locations in the Emergency Department at Duke University Hospital Systems from October 2017 to March 2018. Of the 44 samples collected, 12 were positive for known respiratory pathogens including influenza A, influenza D, and adenovirus. Results suggest bioaerosol sampling may serve as a complement to active surveillance in clinical settings. Additionally, since respiratory viruses were detected in aerosol samples, our results suggest that hospital infection control measures, including the use of N95 respirators, could be used to limit the spread of infectious viruses in the air.
[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] bioaerosol sampling; emergency service; epidemiology; hospital; infectious aerosols; respiratory viruses
PMID: 29963543 PMCID: PMC6011129 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00174
Free full text