• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Acute Med Surg . Efficacy of awake prone positioning for severe illness coronavirus disease 2019 patients: a propensity score-adjusted cohort study

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Acute Med Surg


. 2022 Feb 12;9(1):e734.
doi: 10.1002/ams2.734. eCollection Jan-Dec 2022.
Efficacy of awake prone positioning for severe illness coronavirus disease 2019 patients: a propensity score-adjusted cohort study


Kenji Numata[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Daiki Kobayashi[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Tomohiro Hosoda[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Yutaka Saito[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Ayu Minoura[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Satsuki Yamazaki[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Shigeki Fujitani[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Aim: Awake prone positioning (PP) in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can improve oxygenation. However, evidence showing that it can prevent intubation is lacking. This study investigated the efficacy of awake PP in patients with COVID-19 who received remdesivir, dexamethasone, and anticoagulant therapy.
Methods: This was a two-center cohort study. Patients admitted to the severe COVID-19 patient unit were included. The primary outcome was the intubation rate and secondary outcome was length of stay in the severe COVID-19 unit. After propensity score adjustment, we undertook multivariable regression to calculate the estimates of outcomes between patients who received awake PP and those who did not.
Results: Overall, 108 patients were included (54 [50.0%] patients each who did and did not undergo awake PP), of whom 25 (23.2%) were intubated (with awake PP, 5 [9.3%] vs. without awake PP, 20 [37.0%]; P < 0.01). The median length of stay in the severe COVID-19 unit did not significantly differ (with awake PP, 5 days vs. without awake PP, 5.5 days; P = 0.68). After propensity score adjustment, those who received awake PP had a lower intubation rate than those who did not (odds ratio, 0.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.06-0.85; P = 0.03). Length of stay in the severe COVID-19 patient unit did not differ significantly (adjusted percentage difference, -24.4%; 95% confidence interval, -56.3% to 30.8%; P = 0.32).
Conclusion: Awake PP could be correlated with intubation rate in patients with COVID-19 who are receiving remdesivir, dexamethasone, and anticoagulant therapy.

Keywords: Coronavirus disease 2019; dexamethasone; intubation; prone positioning; respiratory failure.
 
Back
Top Bottom