• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand . Risk factors for and pregnancy outcomes after SARS-CoV-2 in pregnancy according to disease severity: A nationwide cohor

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand


. 2023 Jan 25.
doi: 10.1111/aogs.14512. Online ahead of print.
Risk factors for and pregnancy outcomes after SARS-CoV-2 in pregnancy according to disease severity: A nationwide cohort study with validation of the SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis


Anna J M Aabakke[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP], Tanja G Petersen[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Karen Wøjdemann[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Mette H Ibsen[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Fjola Jonsdottir[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Elisabeth Rønneberg[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Charlotte S Andersen[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Anne Hammer[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Tine D Clausen[SUP] 2 3 [/SUP], Julie Milbak[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Lars Burmester[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Rikke Zethner[SUP] 1 7 [/SUP], Birgitte Lindved[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Annette Thorsen-Meyer[SUP] 11 [/SUP], Mohammed R Khalil[SUP] 12 [/SUP], Birgitte Henriksen[SUP] 12 [/SUP], Lisbeth Jønsson[SUP] 13 [/SUP], Lise L T Andersen[SUP] 14 [/SUP], Kamilla K Karlsen[SUP] 14 [/SUP], Monica L Pedersen[SUP] 15 [/SUP], Gitte Hedermann[SUP] 16 [/SUP], Marianne Vestgaard[SUP] 16 [/SUP], Dorthe Thisted[SUP] 1 17 [/SUP], Agnethe N Fallesen[SUP] 18 [/SUP], Josephine N Johansson[SUP] 18 [/SUP], Ditte C Møller[SUP] 19 [/SUP], Greta Dubietyte[SUP] 19 [/SUP], Charlotte B Andersson[SUP] 20 21 [/SUP], Richard Farlie[SUP] 22 [/SUP], Ane-Kersti Skaarup Knudsen[SUP] 22 [/SUP], Lea Hansen[SUP] 23 [/SUP], Lone Hvidman[SUP] 23 [/SUP], Anne N Sørensen[SUP] 24 [/SUP], Sidsel L Rathcke[SUP] 24 [/SUP], Katrine H Rubin[SUP] 4 25 [/SUP], Lone K Petersen[SUP] 14 25 [/SUP], Jan S Jørgensen[SUP] 14 [/SUP], Lone Krebs[SUP] 3 11 [/SUP], Mette Bliddal[SUP] 4 25 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Introduction: We identified risk factors and outcomes associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy in a universally tested population according to disease severity and validated information on SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy in national health registers in Denmark.
Material and methods: Cohort study using data from national registers and medical records including all pregnancies between March 1, 2020 and February 28, 2021. We compared women with a validated positive SARS-CoV-2 test during pregnancy with non-infected pregnant women. Risk factors and pregnancy outcomes were assessed by Poisson and Cox regression models and stratified according to disease severity defined by hospital admission status and admission reason (COVID-19 symptoms or other). Using medical record data on actual period of pregnancy, we calculated predictive values of the SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis in pregnancy in the registers.
Results: SARS-CoV-2 infection was detected in 1819 (1.6%) of 111 185 pregnancies. Asthma was associated with infection (relative risk [RR] 1.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28-2.07). Risk factors for severe COVID-19 disease requiring hospital admission were high body mass index (median ratio 1.06, 95% CI 1.04-1.09), asthma (RR 7.47, 95% CI 3.51-15.90) and gestational age at the time of infection (gestational age 28-36 vs < 22: RR 3.53, 95% CI 1.75-7.10). SARS-CoV-2-infected women more frequently had hypertensive disorders in pregnancy (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.31, 95% CI 1.04-1.64), early pregnancy loss (aHR 1.37, 95% CI 1.00-1.88), preterm delivery before gestational age 28 (aHR 2.31, 95% CI 1.01-5.26), iatrogenically preterm delivery before gestational age 37 (aHR 1.49, 95% CI 1.01-2.19) and small-for-gestational age children (aHR 1.28, 95% CI 1.05-1.54). The associations were stronger among women admitted to hospital for any reason. The validity of the SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis in relation to pregnancy in the registers compared with medical records showed a negative predictive value of 99.9 (95% CI 99.9-100.0) and a positive predictive value of 82.1 (95% CI 80.4-83.7).
Conclusions: Women infected with SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy were at increased risk of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, early pregnancy loss, preterm delivery and having children small for gestational age. The validity of Danish national registers was acceptable for identification of SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy.

Keywords: COVID-19; cohort studies; obstetric delivery; pregnancy complications; pregnancy outcome; prospective studies; severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; validation study.
 
Back
Top Bottom