tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Front Vet Sci. 2017 Aug 22;4:136. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2017.00136. eCollection 2017.
[h=1]A Stakeholder Survey on Live Bird Market Closures Policy for Controlling Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza in Vietnam.[/h] Nguyen TTT[SUP]1[/SUP], Fearnley L[SUP]2[/SUP], Dinh XT[SUP]3[/SUP], Tran TTA[SUP]4[/SUP], Tran TT[SUP]5[/SUP], Nguyen VT[SUP]5[/SUP], Tago D[SUP]6[/SUP], Padungtod P[SUP]1[/SUP], Newman SH[SUP]1[/SUP], Tripodi A[SUP]7[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]
[h=3]Abstract[/h] Extensive research in Vietnam and elsewhere has shown that live bird markets (LBMs) play a significant role in the ecology and zoonotic transmission of avian influenzas (AIs) including H5N1 and H7N9. Vietnam has a large number of LBMs reflecting the consumer preferences for live poultry. Under pressure to mitigate risks for H7N9 and other zoonotic AIs, Vietnam is considering, among other mitigation measures, temporary closures of LBMs as a policy to reduce risk of AI outbreaks. However, the efficacy of market closure is debated, particularly because little is known about how poultry traders may react, and whether trading may emerge outside formal marketplaces. Combining efforts of anthropologists, economists, sociologists, and veterinarians can be useful to elucidate the drivers behind poultry traders' reactions and better understanding the barriers to implementing risk mitigation measures. In this paper, we present results from a stakeholder survey of LBM stakeholders in Vietnam. Our qualitative data show that trading outside formal markets is very likely to occur in the event of a temporary LBM market closure. Our data show that the poultry value chain in Vietnam remains highly flexible, with traders willing and able to trade poultry in many possible locations. Our results indicate that simplification of the poultry value chain along with strict enforcement, engagement of stakeholders, and adequate communication would be a necessary prerequisite before market closure could be an effective policy.
[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] avian influenza; live bird market; market closure; poultry value chain; risk mitigation; trader opinion
PMID: 28879203 PMCID: PMC5572285 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2017.00136
[h=1]A Stakeholder Survey on Live Bird Market Closures Policy for Controlling Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza in Vietnam.[/h] Nguyen TTT[SUP]1[/SUP], Fearnley L[SUP]2[/SUP], Dinh XT[SUP]3[/SUP], Tran TTA[SUP]4[/SUP], Tran TT[SUP]5[/SUP], Nguyen VT[SUP]5[/SUP], Tago D[SUP]6[/SUP], Padungtod P[SUP]1[/SUP], Newman SH[SUP]1[/SUP], Tripodi A[SUP]7[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]
[h=3]Abstract[/h] Extensive research in Vietnam and elsewhere has shown that live bird markets (LBMs) play a significant role in the ecology and zoonotic transmission of avian influenzas (AIs) including H5N1 and H7N9. Vietnam has a large number of LBMs reflecting the consumer preferences for live poultry. Under pressure to mitigate risks for H7N9 and other zoonotic AIs, Vietnam is considering, among other mitigation measures, temporary closures of LBMs as a policy to reduce risk of AI outbreaks. However, the efficacy of market closure is debated, particularly because little is known about how poultry traders may react, and whether trading may emerge outside formal marketplaces. Combining efforts of anthropologists, economists, sociologists, and veterinarians can be useful to elucidate the drivers behind poultry traders' reactions and better understanding the barriers to implementing risk mitigation measures. In this paper, we present results from a stakeholder survey of LBM stakeholders in Vietnam. Our qualitative data show that trading outside formal markets is very likely to occur in the event of a temporary LBM market closure. Our data show that the poultry value chain in Vietnam remains highly flexible, with traders willing and able to trade poultry in many possible locations. Our results indicate that simplification of the poultry value chain along with strict enforcement, engagement of stakeholders, and adequate communication would be a necessary prerequisite before market closure could be an effective policy.
[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] avian influenza; live bird market; market closure; poultry value chain; risk mitigation; trader opinion
PMID: 28879203 PMCID: PMC5572285 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2017.00136