• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

A randomized controlled study to evaluate the immunogenicity of a trivalent inactivated seasonal influenza vaccine at two dosages in children 6 to 35

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2013 Jun 19;9(9). [Epub ahead of print]
A randomized controlled study to evaluate the immunogenicity of a trivalent inactivated seasonal influenza vaccine at two dosages in children 6 to 35 months of age.
Pavia-Ruz N, Angel Rodriguez Weber M, Lau YL, Nelson EA, Phirangkul AK, Huang LM, Silas P, Qaqundah P, Blatter M, Jeanfreau R, Lei P, Jain V, El Idrissi M, Feng Y, Innis B, Peeters M, Devaster JM.
Source

Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico; Mexico City, Mexico.
Abstract

The trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine Fluarix? is licensed in the US for adults and children from 3 y old. This randomized observer-blind study (NCT00764790) evaluated Fluarix? at two doses; 0.25 ml (Flu-25) and 0.5ml (Flu-50) in children aged 6-35 mo. The primary objective was to demonstrate immunogenic non-inferiority vs. a control vaccine (Fluzone?; 0.25 ml). Children received Flu-25 (n = 1107), Flu-50 (n = 1106) or control vaccine (n = 1104) at Day 0 and for un-primed children, also on Day 28. Serum hemagglutination-inhibition titers were determined pre-vaccination and at Day 28 (primed) or Day 56 (un-primed). Non-inferiority was assessed by post-vaccination geometric mean titer (GMT) ratio, (upper 95% confidence interval [CI] ≤ 1.5) and difference in seroconversion rate (upper 95% CI ≤ 10%). Reactogenicity/safety was monitored. The immune response to Flu-50 met all regulatory criteria. Indicated by adjusted GMT ratios [with 95% CI], the criteria for non-inferiority of Flu-50 vs. control vaccine were reached for the B/Florida strain (1.13 [1.01-1.25]) but not for the A/Brisbane/H1N1 (1.74 [1.54-1.98]) or A/Uruguay/H3N2 (1.72 [1.57-1.89]) strains. In children aged 18-35 mo similar immune responses were observed for Flu-50 and the control vaccine. Flu-50 induced a higher response than Flu-25 for all strains. Temperature (≥ 37.5?C) was reported in 6.2%, 6.4%, and 6.6% of the Flu-25, Flu-50, and control group, respectively. Reactogenicity/safety endpoints were within the same range for all vaccines. In children aged 6-35 mo, immune responses with Flu-50 fulfilled regulatory criteria but did not meet the pre-defined criteria for non-inferiority vs. control. This appeared to be due to differences in immunogenicity in children aged < 18 mo.
KEYWORDS:

children, immunogenicity, influenza, trivalent inactivated, vaccine

PMID:
23782962
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23782962
 
Back
Top Bottom