• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

A randomised, single-blind, dose-range study to assess the immunogenicity and safety of a cell-culture-derived A/H1N1 influenza vaccine in adult and e

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Christoph Hatza, b,
Jakob P. Cramerc,
Andr? Vertruyend,
Tino F. Schwarze,
Frank von Sonnenburgf,
Astrid Borkowskig, Corresponding author contact information, E-mail the corresponding author,
Maria Lattanzig,
Anne Katrin Hilbertg,
Giovanni Della Cioppag,
Geert Leroux-Roelsh

a Division of Communicable Diseases, Institute for Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
b Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland
c Section Tropical Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
d St.Vincentius Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
e Central Laboratory and Vaccine Centre, Stiftung Juliusspital, Wuerzburg, Germany
f Department of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, University of Munich, Germany
g Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Siena, Italy
h Centre for Vaccinology, Ghent University and Hospital, Belgium

Received 21 November 2011. Revised 4 May 2012. Accepted 9 May 2012. Available online 21 May 2012.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.05.013, How to Cite or Link Using DOI

Background

Modern cell-culture production techniques and the use of adjuvants helps to ensure that the global demand for pandemic influenza vaccine can be met. This study aimed to assess the immunogenicty and safety profiles of various cell-culture-derived A/H1N1 pandemic vaccine formulations in healthy adult and elderly subjects.
Methods

Adult (18?60 years) subjects (n = 544) received vaccine either containing 3.75 μg of antigen with half the standard dose of MF59? (Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics) adjuvant, 7.5 μg antigen with a full dose of MF59, or a non-adjuvanted vaccine containing 15 μg of antigen. Elderly (≥61 years) subjects (n = 268) received either the 3.75 μg or 7.5 μg adjuvanted formulations. Two priming vaccine doses were administered 3 weeks apart, followed by a single booster dose of seasonal influenza vaccine 1 year later. Immunogenicity was assessed 3 weeks after each vaccination. The safety profile of each formulation was evaluated throughout the study.
Results

A single primary dose of each A/H1N1 vaccine formulation was sufficient to meet all three European (CHMP) licensure criteria for pandemic influenza vaccines in adult subjects. Two licensure criteria were met after one vaccine dose in elderly subjects; two primary doses were required to meet all three criteria in this age group. The highest antibody titres were observed in response to the 7.5 μg vaccine containing a full dose of MF59 adjuvant. All subjects rapidly generated seroprotective antibody titres in response to booster vaccination.
Conclusion

This study identified one 3.75 μg vaccine dose containing half the standard dose of MF59 adjuvant as optimal for adults, two doses were optimal for elderly subjects. The antigen-sparing properties of MF59, and rapid, modern, cell-culture production techniques represent significant steps towards meeting the global demand for influenza vaccine.
Highlights

► One dose of cell-culture-derived, pandemic influenza vaccine adequate for adults. ► Two doses required for the elderly. Adjuvanted vaccine well tolerated in all subjects. ► Rapid production by cell-culture helps to meet global demand for pandemic vaccines.


http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X12007050
 
Back
Top Bottom