• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

A PBMC-Based System to Assess Human T Cell Responses to Influenza Vaccine Candidates In Vitro

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
accines (Basel). 2019 Nov 13;7(4). pii: E181. doi: 10.3390/vaccines7040181. [h=1]A PBMC-Based System to Assess Human T Cell Responses to Influenza Vaccine Candidates In Vitro.[/h]
Tapia-Calle G[SUP]1[/SUP], Born PA[SUP]2[/SUP], Koutsoumpli G[SUP]1[/SUP], Gonzalez-Rodriguez MI[SUP]1[/SUP], Hinrichs WLJ[SUP]2[/SUP], Huckriede ALW[SUP]1[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h] 1 Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, 9713AV Groningen, The Netherlands. 2 Department of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmacy, University of Groningen, 9713AV Groningen, The Netherlands.

[h=3]Abstract[/h] Vaccine development is an expensive and time-consuming process that heavily relies on animal models. Yet, vaccine candidates that have previously succeeded in animal experiments often fail in clinical trials questioning the predictive value of animal models. Alternative assay systems that can add to the screening and evaluation of functional characteristics of vaccines in a human context before embarking on costly clinical trials are therefore urgently needed. In this study, we have established an in vitro system consisting of long-term cultures of unfractionated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from healthy volunteers to assess (recall) T cell responses to vaccine candidates. We observed that different types of influenza vaccines (whole inactivated virus (WIV), split, and peptide vaccines) were all able to stimulate CD4 and CD8 T cell responses but to different extents in line with their reported in vivo properties. In-depth analyses of different T cell subsets revealed that the tested vaccines evoked mainly recall responses as indicated by the fact that the vast majority of the responding T cells had a memory phenotype. Furthermore, we observed vaccine-induced activation of T follicular helper cells, which are associated with the induction of humoral immune responses. Our results demonstrate the suitability of the established PBMC-based system for the in vitro evaluation of memory T cell responses to vaccines and the comparison of vaccine candidates in a human immune cell context. As such, it can help to bridge the gap between animal experiments and clinical trials and assist in the selection of promising vaccine candidates, at least for recall antigens.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] T cells; T follicular helper cells; WIV; in vitro; influenza; peptides; split; vaccines

PMID: 31766202 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines7040181
 
Back
Top Bottom