• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

A Feasibility Trial of Home Administration of Intranasal Vaccine by Parents to Eligible Children

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Clin Ther. 2016 Dec 6. pii: S0149-2918(16)30856-6. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.11.018. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]A Feasibility Trial of Home Administration of Intranasal Vaccine by Parents to Eligible Children.[/h] Jhaveri R[SUP]1[/SUP], Allyne K[SUP]2[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]PURPOSE:[/h] Intranasal vaccines are being developed for protection against many different infectious agents. The currently available intranasal live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) is only approved for administration by medical personnel. We conducted a pilot study to investigate the feasibility of training parents to give LAIV to their own children.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] Subjects were recruited from several sources: a university-based outpatient clinic, university employee e-mail announcement, and direct referrals from study subjects. After confirming eligibility to receive LAIV, consented parents were trained by viewing a video with the study staff. LAIV was provided in a cooler with instructions to vaccinate within 24 hours. Telephone follow-up was conducted to confirm proper administration and to assess parental attitudes about home administration. At season's end, immunization registry and hospital records were reviewed to confirm no additional doses were given.
[h=4]FINDINGS:[/h] Twenty-seven families with 41 children were enrolled. All participants successfully administered LAIV to their children, and all preferred or strongly preferred home administration to an office visit for getting vaccinated. Two families stated that without this option they would not have otherwise vaccinated their children. Adverse events were minor. All patients had their state vaccine registries accurately updated and none received duplicate doses. Upon review, no reimbursement was received for vaccination.
[h=4]IMPLICATIONS:[/h] Home administration of intranasal LAIV was successful and well received. This option could be used in the future for LAIV or other intranasal vaccines as a way to increase vaccination rates and convenience for parents. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01938170.
Copyright ? 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] children; influenza; intranasal; live attenuated influenza vaccine; parents; self-administration

PMID: 27938896 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.11.018
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
 
Back
Top Bottom