• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

A Crisis is a Terrible Thing to Waste

kent nickell

Well-known member
This thread title was the title of a book review in the 10/19/07 issue of Science by Paul S. Keim, Dpt of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University....

The book is Are We Ready? Public Health Since 9/11 by David Rosner and Gerald Markowitz 2006

""The failed smallpox vaccination program initiated in December 2002 was driven by federal priorities yet had to be implemented at the state and local levels. To state officials, the true nature of the threat was not obvious. As a result, many of them did not fully engage in a program that was funded at less than its true implementation cost. In addition, the public did not fully recognize the threat, and an already-existing, organized anti-immunization community was fighting all vaccination programs. Lastly, in a healthcare environment severly affected by malpractice litigation, the risk of downstream liablilty and the potentially high costs of compensation to vaccination victims posed a threat to caregivers and healthcare administrators. As Gene Matthews (Georgia State University) summarized, "there were three concerns: liability, compensation, and risk assessment... these issues got mixed up with each other." This smallpox vaccination program was not coupled to overall public health development. Georges Benjamin (American Public Health Association) noted that single-minded attention to smallpox "sacrificed core public health activities.' Rosner and Markowitz point to this progam as an example of how federal dictates to the states were ill-fated, mismanaged, and detrimental to long-term infrastructure goals. ""

""Rosner and Markowitz weave commentary and analysis throughout the book but conclude with some basic lessons learned. First, in a crisis the available public health infrastructure makes all the difference in the quality of the local and federal response. Although timely leadership was important, it was effective only within the constraints of what the previous years' efforts had provided. Because of the unpredictability of the next crisis, public health infrastructure is the single most important way of preparing the nation. Second, the authors argue for a redefinition of public health to be more comprehensive and to include the mental health of the population. In addition to the traditional concern with the physical well-being of the population, social and economic health need to be included in the response to crises. Third, they observed that the failure to communicate honestly to the public, even if officials have good intentions to calm a chaotic situation, will lead to the subsequent mistrust of all communication. Lastly, the authors recommend that clear lines of authority need to be established in a crisis. Local authority need not be usurped, but decisive leadership, perhaps from the federal level, is critical. ""

Also just came across another interesting looking book on Amazon.com..

Editorial Reviews

Book Description
This first comprehensive history of the social and political aspects of vaccination in the United States tells the story of how vaccination became a widely accepted public health measure over the course of the twentieth century. One hundred years ago, just a handful of vaccines existed, and only one, for smallpox, was widely used. Today more than two dozen vaccines are in use, fourteen of which are universally recommended for children. State of Immunity examines the strategies that health officials have used--ranging from advertising and public relations campaigns to laws requiring children to be immunized before they can attend school--to gain public acceptance of vaccines. Like any medical intervention, vaccination carries a small risk of adverse reactions. But unlike other procedures, it is performed on healthy people, most commonly children, and has been mandated by law. Vaccination thus poses unique ethical, political, and legal questions.
James Colgrove considers how individual liberty should be balanced against the need to protect the common welfare, how experts should act in the face of incomplete or inconsistent scientific information, and how the public should be involved in these decisions.
A well-researched, intelligent, and balanced look at a timely topic, this book explores these issues through a vivid historical narrative that offers new insights into the past, present, and future of vaccination.

About the Author
James Colgrove is Associate Research Scientist at the Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Product Details

Hardcover: 349 pages
Publisher: University of California Press; 1 edition (October 5, 2006)

State of Immunity: The Politics of Vaccination in Twentieth-Century America (California/Milbank Books on Health and the Public) (Hardcover)
by James Colgrove (Author)
 
Re: A Crisis is a Terrible Thing to Waste

Interesting cold war vignette from State of Immunity: The Politics of Vaccination in Twentieth-Century America

This concerns polio vaccination in the 50's and 60's. In the US we started out with the Salk vaccine which was a killed virus given as a series of 3 shots. When the Sabin vaccine became available which was an attenuated live virus given orally by a sugar cube and seemed to possibly provide better immunity we had too many people already vaccinated with Salk to give it a good trial in the US. So the vaccine was first tried in the Soviet Union....

""Because the widespread use of the Salk vaccine rendered it impossible to conduct such an investigation in the US, the research was conducted abroad. By far the largest was a massive trial of Albert Sabin's vaccine, which, in an extraordinary instance of Cold War cooperation, was carried out in the Soviet Union in 1959. Some ten million children in eleven Soviet republics received the Sabin vaccine, and a subsequent evaluation found it to be hightly effective and completely safe, with no vaccine-induced paralysis reported.""

""Whether an inactivated or a live attenuated vaccine was superior had been the subject of intense disagreements within the scientific communnity since the mid 1940s. Several researchers continued to pursue work on a live attenuated vaccine, which, they contended, offered immunologic and practical advantages over an inactivated one. As an added benefit, recipients of the live vaccine excreted the attenuated virus in their feces and thus indirectly passed along immunity to close contacts who had not themselves received the vaccine. Whereas Salk's vaccine was slow to stimulate antibody production and required repeated boosters to produce full immunity, a live vaccine produced strong immunity almost immediately (usually in days instead of months); it could therefore be used to control an outbreak of disease that was just beginning or already in progress.""
 
Back
Top