• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

A Controversial Bill (H.R. 897) To Mosquito Control Programs: A Policy Analysis

Emily

Editor, Senior Moderator
http://uknowledge.uky.edu/cph_etds/78/
A Controversial Bill (H.R. 897) To Mosquito Control Programs: A Policy Analysis


Charles Guissou, University of Kentucky


[h=4]Year of Publication 2016[/h]
[h=4]College Public Health[/h]
[h=4]Degree Name Master of Public Health (M.P.H.)[/h]
[h=4]Committee Chair Sarah Wackerbarth, PhD[/h]
[h=4]Committee Member Richard C. Ingram, DrPH[/h]
[h=4]Committee Member Hefei Wen, PhD[/h]
Abstract
The primary purpose of this paper was to analyze the legal, financial, and administrative burdens of the Pesticides General Permit on mosquito control programs from a policy perspective. Mosquito control is often highly controversial, particularly when it involves the use of pesticides that have their own potentially serious health and environmental impacts. In 2009, the Environment Protection Agency issued the permit to be obtained by pesticide applicators before pesticides could be discharged into waterways in addition to existing Federal Insecticides, Fungicides, and Rodenticides Act (FIFRA) regulations. Some provisions of the permit could impact mosquito control activities. Therefore, in response to that new regulatory layer a bill (H.R. 897) was proposed as a policy solution to repeal the regulation requirements so that mosquito control programs would apply mosquito pesticides under FIFRA regulations only. The change is backed by mosquito control professionals and pesticides industry interest groups but objected to by environmental activists.
Even though the bill has a bipartisan support in both the House and the Senate, it has yet to become a law. So far, since the implementation of the permit regulations, no state or local mosquito control pesticide applicator has complained of any barriers limiting its activities and none have been subjected to a legal action. Moreover, the regulation has been implemented seamlessly across the country. As a result, our policy analysis didn?t support the repeal of the Pesticides General Permit as requested by mosquito control professionals. The principal contribution of this policy analysis is to advocate for effective, efficient, and environmentally sound mosquito control practices that will help minimize or eliminate the discharge of pesticides into waters of the United States.


[h=4]Recommended Citation[/h] Guissou, Charles, "A Controversial Bill (H.R. 897) To Mosquito Control Programs: A Policy Analysis" (2016). Theses and Dissertations--Public Health (M.P.H. & Dr.P.H.). Paper 78.
http://uknowledge.uky.edu/cph_etds/78

Full text available at link.
 
Back
Top