• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

A 28-day subchronic feeding study of chicken injected by genetically modified DNA-vaccine of avian influenzas in Sprague-Dawley rats

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2018 Jul 26. pii: S0273-2300(18)30205-8. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.07.021. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]A 28-day subchronic feeding study of chicken injected by genetically modified DNA-vaccine of avian influenzas in Sprague-Dawley rats.[/h] Cao Y[SUP]1[/SUP], He X[SUP]2[/SUP], Xu W[SUP]2[/SUP], Huang K[SUP]3[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] The safety of Veterinary vaccines based on the meat vaccinated by modified highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) vaccine after oral ingestion was evaluated. The assessment was conducted in Sprague-Dawley rats by a 28-days feeding study. We incorporated meat from vaccinated chicken and non-vaccinated chicken into rodent diets at two concentrations (7.5%, 15%) and administered to Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 10/sex/group) for 28 days. A commercialized rodent diet was fed to an additional group as control group. Body weight, feed consumption and toxicological response variables were measured, and gross as well as microscopic pathology were examined. No death or adverse effects were observed in the current feeding study. The results of most studies indicated that there were no adverse effects between the groups fed with diets containing fractions from meat of vaccinated animals and the groups consumed diets composed of edible fractions from meat of non-vaccination animals.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Avian influenza; Food safety; Genetically modified; Oral ingestion; Vaccine

PMID: 30056246 DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.07.021
 
Back
Top Bottom