• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

_|PRE-PANDEMIC VACCINES: An Adjuvanted, Low-Dose, Pandemic Influenza A (H5N1) Vaccine|_|_

Giuseppe

Emeritus
[Presented in part: Bangkok International Conference on Avian Influenza 2008: Integration from Knowledge to Control, Bangkok, 23-25 January 2008.]

[ABSTRACTS, RESEARCH] An Adjuvanted, Low-Dose, Pandemic Influenza A (H5N1) Vaccine Candidate Is Safe, Immunogenic, and Induces Cross-Reactive Immune Responses in Healthy Adults

Karin Levie,1 Isabel Leroux-Roels,2 Karel Hoppenbrouwers,3 Anne-Diane Kervyn,1 Corinne Vandermeulen,3 Sheron Forgus,2 Geert Leroux-Roels,2 Sylvie Pichon,4 and Inca Kusters4

1Ecole de Sant? Publique, Universit? Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, 2Center for Vaccinology, Ghent University and Hospital, Ghent, and 3Centre for Youth Health Care, Katholieke Universiteit, Leuven, Belgium; 4Sanofi Pasteur, Marcy l'Etoile, France

Background.
To protect a naive global population against pandemic influenza, pandemic vaccines should be effective at low antigen doses, because of limited manufacturing capacity.

Methods.
In a multicenter, randomized, blind-observer phase 1 trial, groups of 50 healthy young adults received 2 doses, 21 days apart, of influenza A/Vietnam/1194/2004 NIBRG-14 (H5N1) vaccine containing 1.9, 3.8, 7.5 or 15 μg of hemagglutinin with oil-in-water emulsion adjuvant or 7.5 μg of hemagglutinin without adjuvant. Safety was monitored to day 42. Homologous hemagglutination-inhibition (HI) and microneutralization titers were determined after each vaccination. Cross-reactivity against A/Indonesia/05/2005 RG2 was tested after the second vaccination.

Results.
No vaccine-related significant or serious adverse events occurred. Injection site reactions, but not systemic reactions, were more frequent with adjuvant than without. Even with only 1.9 μg of hemagglutinin plus adjuvant, 72% of subjects had HI titers 1:32 after 2 doses. This proportion was 81%-89% with higher adjuvanted doses but was only 34% without adjuvant. Adjuvanted vaccine induced cross-neutralizing antibodies in 39%-65% of samples, versus 7% without adjuvant.

Conclusions.
The emulsion-adjuvanted pandemic influenza vaccine candidate was safe, immunogenic, and induced cross-reactive antibodies. This adjuvanted 1.9-μg candidate is the lowest effective dose tested to date. This could have a major impact on prepandemic vaccination strategies with stockpiled batches of vaccine.

Trial registration. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00457509.

Received 12 February 2008; accepted 28 April 2008; electronically published 24 June 2008.

Potential conflicts of interest: K.L., K.H., and G.L.-R. have been principal investigators of vaccine trials for several vaccine manufacturers, including Sanofi Pasteur, for which their institutions obtained research grants. S.P. and I.K. are employed by Sanofi Pasteur. All other authors declare no potential conflicts.

Presented in part: Bangkok International Conference on Avian Influenza 2008: Integration from Knowledge to Control, Bangkok, 23-25 January 2008.

Financial support: Sanofi Pasteur, France.
(See the article by Goji et al., on pages XXX-XX, and the editorial commentary by Poland and Sambhara, on pages XXX-XX.)

Reprints or correspondence: Dr. Karin Levie, Ecole de Sant? Publique, UCL, Clos Chapelle aux Champs 30 B39, 1200 Brussels, Belgium (karin.levie@centredesante.ucl.ac.be).
-
------
 
Re: _|PRE-PANDEMIC VACCINES: An Adjuvanted, Low-Dose, Pandemic Influenza A (H5N1) Vaccine|_|_

> limited manufacturing capacity

I keep hearing this, but I doubt it.
No comment from vaccine producers, no answer
to my emails.
It doesn't make sense.
Earlier they did say, the hens couldn't lay more eggs ...
but now we have cell based production, which earlier they claimed
would be superior since it could be scaled up.
So, they got much funding from HHS and others.

Now, they refuse to comment on capacity.

I assume it's all about pricing. They could scale up, but want a good price.


Strangely, I made this point earlier in multiple birdflu-forums,
sent emails to authorities and vaccine producers, but
didn't get much interest.
Flubies and politicians and officials seem to be indifferent
about this issue.





So, I ask again:
Could we scale up vaccine production in a pandemic ?

Do you think, this question shouldn't be asked,
is not important ?
 
Back
Top