• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

1918 - Swine or Bird Origin?

Re: 1918 - Swine or Bird Origin?

Volume 361:225-229 July 16, 2009 Number 3


The Persistent Legacy of the 1918 Influenza Virus

David M. Morens, M.D., Jeffery K. Taubenberger, M.D., Ph.D., and Anthony S. Fauci, M.D.

It is not generally appreciated that descendents of the H1N1 influenza A virus that caused the catastrophic and historic pandemic of 1918–1919 have persisted in humans for more than 90 years and have continued to contribute their genes to new viruses, causing new pandemics, epidemics, and epizootics (see table). The current international pandemic caused by a novel influenza A (H1N1) virus derived from two unrelated swine viruses, one of them a derivative of the 1918 human virus,3 adds to the complexity surrounding this persistent progenitor virus, its descendants, and its several lineages (see diagram).

(charts not copied)

A useful way to think about influenza A events of the past 91 years is to recognize that we are living in a pandemic era that began around 1918.4 At that time, a presumably new founding virus, containing a novel set of eight influenza genes and probably derived from an unidentified avian-like precursor virus, became adapted to mammals; the molecular and virologic events responsible for that adaptation remain unclear. This virus caused an explosive and historic pandemic, during which humans also transmitted the virus to pigs, in which it remains in circulation. Ever since 1918, this tenacious virus has drawn on a bag of evolutionary tricks to survive in one form or another, in both humans and pigs, and to spawn a host of novel progeny viruses with novel gene constellations, through the periodic importation or exportation of viral genes (see Zimmer and Burke, pages 279–285). The 2009 H1N1 pandemic virus represents yet another genetic product in the still-growing family tree of this remarkable 1918 virus.

To understand what has been happening since 1918, it is helpful to think of influenza viruses not as distinct entities but as eight-member "gene teams" that work together and must sometimes trade away one or more team members to make way for new gene "players" with unique skills. In nature, avian influenza A viruses seem to exist as transient complexes of eight genes that assemble and reassemble promiscuously, if not randomly, in an enormous global avian reservoir. Within this reservoir, avian viruses remain stably adapted to the enteric tracts of hundreds of avian species, single members of which are often simultaneously infected by multiple viruses that engage in prolific gene reassortment. Because of this continual reassortment, a seemingly endless variety of new viruses with potentially new properties are continually being engineered. Indeed, thousands of unique gene constellations making up avian influenza viruses have already been identified; as research continues, the number will undoubtedly grow.

The mechanisms by which avian viruses cross species barriers to infect humans or other mammals, either causing dead-end infections or leading to subsequent human-to-human transmission, are unknown. Moreover, the properties of influenza viruses that have the greatest medical and public health relevance, such as human infectivity, transmissibility, and pathogenicity, appear to be complex and polygenic and are poorly understood. Every influenza A virus has a gene coding for 1 of 16 possible hemagglutinin (HA) surface proteins and another gene coding for 1 of 9 possible neuraminidase (NA) surface proteins. These two proteins (facilitating viral attachment and release, respectively) not only are critical for the infection of susceptible cells of a host but also elicit immune responses that prevent infection or independently reduce viral replication, respectively. Of the 144 total combinatorial possibilities, only three HAs and two NAs, in only 3 combinations (H1N1, H2N2, and H3N2), have ever been found in truly human-adapted viruses — a fact that suggests inherent limitations in host adaptation. In addition to possible constraints related to HA or NA, viruses adapted to humans or other mammals may be constrained by a need for all their genes to be coadapted both to the host and to each other — a requirement that seems to be particularly difficult to fulfill. Chimeric viruses containing fewer than all eight genes of the 1918 virus, for example, are not as pathogenic in animal models as the fully reconstructed 1918 virus.

Once new human influenza viruses appear and cause pandemics, population immunity to their HA and NA proteins increases quickly. The powerful counterforce of population immunity is met by the remarkable ability of influenza virus to evolve by means of mutation (drift) or acquisition through reassortment either of different HA subtypes (shift) or through intrasubtypic reassortment with variant HAs of the same subtype or of other genes of cocirculating viruses.5 Direct descendants of the 1918 virus caused "shift pandemics" in 1957 (H2N2) and 1968 (H3N2); they also caused "pandemic-like events" associated with intrasubtypic reassortment in 1947 (H1N1), 1951 (H1N1), 1997 (H3N2), and 2003 (H3N2). By convention, the term "pandemic" influenza has been reserved for global influenza epidemics caused by viruses with new HA subtypes; it has not been consistently applied to widespread or even global epidemics resulting from other viral genetic changes. But the long-held belief that shifts always cause severe pandemics, whereas drifts lead to more modest increases in seasonal mortality, has been called into question. The effects on mortality of new influenza viruses created by the several genetic mechanisms mentioned above are not easily characterized (see table).1,2 In this regard, it is noteworthy that although the precise viruses that circulated before 1918 and the mechanisms of their generation are unknown, probable influenza pandemics have, over several centuries, shown marked variation in severity, ranging from mild (e.g., the 1761–1762 pandemic) to severe (e.g., the 1833–1837 pandemic, which had a 2% case fatality rate).

It is remarkable not only that direct "all-eight-gene" descendants of the 1918 virus still circulate in humans as epidemic H1N1 viruses and in swine as epizootic H1N1 viruses, but also that for the past 50 years the original virus and its progeny have continually donated genes to new viruses to cause new pandemics, epidemics, and epizootics. The novel H1N1 virus associated with the ongoing 2009 pandemic is a fourth-generation descendant of the 1918 virus. The complex evolutionary history of this virus features genetic mixing both within human viruses and between avian- and swine-adapted influenza viruses, gene-segment evolution in multiple species, and evolution in response to the selection pressures of herd immunity in various populations at various points in time. The fact that this novel H1N1 influenza A virus has become a pandemic virus expands the previous definition of the term.

The 1918 influenza virus and its progeny, and the human immunity developed in response to them, have for nearly a century evolved in an elaborate dance; the partners have remained linked and in step, even as each strives to take the lead. This complex interplay between rapid viral evolution and virally driven changes in human population immunity has created a "pandemic era" lasting for 91 years and counting. There is little evidence that this era is about to come to an end.

If there is good news, it is that successive pandemics and pandemic-like events generally appear to be decreasing in severity over time. This diminution is surely due in part to advances in medicine and public health, but it may also reflect viral evolutionary "choices" that favor optimal transmissibility with minimal pathogenicity — a virus that kills its hosts or sends them to bed is not optimally transmissible. Although we must be prepared to deal with the possibility of a new and clinically severe influenza pandemic caused by an entirely new virus, we must also understand in greater depth, and continue to explore, the determinants and dynamics of the pandemic era in which we live.

http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/NEJMp0904819

.
 
Re: 1918 - Swine or Bird Origin?

What I take away from the above new paper, in regards to avian flu, is that avian strains are reservoirs to all influenzas - donating genes as needed. Being a "seed bank" is different than being a parent.

I like the description of influenza acting like a sports team - trading players. :)

.
 
Re: 1918 - Swine or Bird Origin?

What I take away from the above new paper, in regards to avian flu, is that avian strains are reservoirs to all influenzas - donating genes as needed. Being a "seed bank" is different than being a parent.

I like the description of influenza acting like a sports team - trading players. :)

.

This matches my own understanding, in that influenza A viruses are primarily avian. But they aren't that picky and became endemic in other species.

I am really curious, but I know we are unlikely ever to have an answer for this, when the A viruses first crossed into humans. That epidemic must have been a very nasty one.
 
Re: 1918 - Swine or Bird Origin?

.... when the A viruses first crossed into humans. That epidemic must have been a very nasty one.

I've wondered the same thing. I assume it was when humans first started catching and eating birds, or at least when they first domesticated some - like geese. But maybe we should go back to the first animals domesticated by humans who were capable of catching influenza - maybe it was the dog.

.
 
Re: 1918 - Swine or Bird Origin?

I've wondered the same thing. I assume it was when humans first started catching and eating birds, or at least when they first domesticated some - like geese. But maybe we should go back to the first animals domesticated by humans who were capable of catching influenza - maybe it was the dog.

.

And what was the origin of the A viruses? Were they inherited by birds as they evolved from dinosaurs (using the classical definition of dinosaur)? Or move into birds from some other source at a later date?
 
Re: 1918 - Swine or Bird Origin?

Perhaps the answer is in the study of the mimivirus, the theoretical "mother" of all viruses.

.
 
Re: Mexico Swine Flu Re-infection Spec

Re: Mexico Swine Flu Re-infection Spec

Right. He doesn't think H1N1 was in swine prior to 1918 because there were no reports of sick swine, which doesn't mean much because most swine infected with H1N1 are asymptomatic (but no one is calling 1918 avian).

Well, I'm certainly not one to put words in Jeffery's mouth, but my impression is, and I seem to recall a statement from him on the issue, that the characteristics of the 1918 genes are rather wild and avian in nature.

Now, that doesn't mean that these genes were not in swine and mixing in mammalian genes as well. And like yourself, I'm inclined to think that the jump to humans would be much easier from swine than directly from our winged friends.
 
Re: Mexico Swine Flu Re-infection Spec

Re: Mexico Swine Flu Re-infection Spec

Well, I'm certainly not one to put words in Jeffery's mouth, but my impression is, and I seem to recall a statement from him on the issue, that the characteristics of the 1918 genes are rather wild and avian in nature.

Now, that doesn't mean that these genes were not in swine and mixing in mammalian genes as well. And like yourself, I'm inclined to think that the jump to humans would be much easier from swine than directly from our winged friends.

The idea that H1N1 in swine began in 1918 really doesn't make much sense. As you know, swine has be called the mixing vessel. It can support human and avian (as well as swine). The idea that they didn't support any influenza prior to 1918 really doesn't add up. Swine is much like human (the swine serotopes are H1, H2, H3, just like human) and influenza has been in humans for a very long time, so there is no reason to think that all of these parallels between human and swine suddenly began in 1918.

Human and swine have been around for some time and in 1918 they got together and created the pandemic 1918, which will be repeated with the 2009 strain.
 
Re: 1918 - Swine or Bird Origin?

I've wondered the same thing. I assume it was when humans first started catching and eating birds, or at least when they first domesticated some - like geese. But maybe we should go back to the first animals domesticated by humans who were capable of catching influenza - maybe it was the dog.

.

As primates in the wild catch influenza it seems to me possible that even the first "humans" could have caught it.
 
Re: 1918 - Swine or Bird Origin?

As primates in the wild catch influenza it seems to me possible that even the first "humans" could have caught it.

If influenza, of any form, has been around that long. How do we know it isn't a fairly recent virus? Maybe that could explain the relative ease with which it jumps species boundaries?
 
Re: 1918 - Swine or Bird Origin?

As primates in the wild catch influenza it seems to me possible that even the first "humans" could have caught it.
Yes, primates and other mammals.....marmots, seals, felines, etc....all the known carriers of influenza. I suppose it wouldn't even need to be domesticated, but rather just live in close proximity to humans and have a connection to birds, e.g., wild felines.

.
 
Re: 1918 - Swine or Bird Origin?

flu-B is adapted to humans and only occurs in humans.
It did split from flu-A (or better their common ancestor)
some thousand years ago.
flu-A in humans could be rather recent, with the increase
of humans and their traveling by horses, ships.
Sometimes humans and horses got flu the same time
in the 19th century.

All flu-A is avian in nature, you can see it by counting A,T
nucleotides. The most recent common ancestors of
most bird viruses goes back to the 19th century, when
some bottleneck events created most bird-flus that
are around today. Except HA and NA which reassort much more
in birds than in humans. The different types of HAs and NAs
go back ~300-1000 years.
No segment of human flu-A is known before the 1889 pandemic
which they suppose was H3N8(?).
Apparantly all these previous pandemic strains were unsuccessful,
they eventually died. Swine became important omly some
hundred years ago

I found this old thread:
http://www.flutrackers.com/forum/showthread.php?t=34185

paper about the origins of HAs,flu-B,C
http://mbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/19/4/501
 
Re: 1918 - Swine or Bird Origin?

niman continues to ignore the AT-score which shows avian character.
niman says ** has avian genes although these were in swine
since 11 years while 1918 has no avian genes but evidence is big
that segments 2,3 were less than 10 years in mammals ,
likely less than 5 (IMO). Segments 1,6,7,8 less than 20 years,
more likely 10 and maybe even jumped from birds to mammals
shortly before the pandemic, we can't exclude that.
Segment 4 <40 years, more likely less than 20 (IMO)

niman ignores the matching bird sequences for the 8 segments:
Code:
segment
difference to 1918 in 1/100 %
#differences
#nucleotdes considered
number in my database
virus name
------------------------------------------------------------
1  951  217 2280 2888 blue-winged teal/ALB/286/1977(H3N6)
2  800  182 2274 3234 turkey/Ontario/7732/1966(H5N9)
3  776  167 2151 3186 pintail Dk/ALB/219/1977(H1N1)
4 1887  321 1701   35 A/mallard duck/ALB/127/1977(H1N1)
5 1082  162 1497 2304 black Dk/Ohio/95/1993(H1N1)
6  848  114 1344  158 fowl/Rostock/45/1934(H7N1)
7  432   42  972 2957 shorebird/DE/236/03(H11N9)
8  357   30  838  572 turkey/Ontario/6118/1968(H8N4)

4 1916  326 1701  137 A/Anas crecca/Spain/1384/2007(H1N1)
6 1255  177 1410  162 Ck/Taiwan/G23/87(H6N1)
8  477   40  838  253 mallard/Minnesota/Sg-00133/07(H4N6)

with common ancestors of 1918-flu only a few decade(s) before 1918.
 
Re: 1918 - Swine or Bird Origin?

Volume 361:225-229 July 16, 2009 Number 3


The Persistent Legacy of the 1918 Influenza Virus

David M. Morens, M.D., Jeffery K. Taubenberger, M.D., Ph.D., and Anthony S. Fauci, M.D.
...
If there is good news, it is that successive pandemics and pandemic-like events generally appear to be decreasing in severity over time. This diminution is surely due in part to advances in medicine and public health, but it may also reflect viral evolutionary "choices" that favor optimal transmissibility with minimal pathogenicity — a virus that kills its hosts or sends them to bed is not optimally transmissible...

http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/NEJMp0904819

.

The idea that pathogens ought to evolve to become less virulent in their host species in order to optimise transmission rate - is old thinking and not particularly credible. Pathogens evolve to maximise their basic reproductive rate and this might be achieved with high virulence, low virulence or intermediate virulence. Which strategy is optimal depends on the dynamic interplay betwen pathogen and host populations and the external environment. Some pathogens (eg. baculoviruses) actually need to kill their hosts in order to be transmitted at all.

The potential benfits of a high virulence strategy for influenza viruses are not well understood. I wonder if the article is somewhat contradictary on this point: the 1918/19 flu virus complex clearly did evolve a high virulence strategy among one or more of its constituent members and, consequently (?), some members of the complex continue to persist to this day. Competition and cooperation via information exchange (= complex adaptive behaviour).

On another site, I have pondered whether a high virulence strategy helps the flu virus complex to persist and spread by limiting the verticle transmission of acquired immunity (mother to offspring) into the proceeding host generation?
 
Last edited:
Re: 1918 - Swine or Bird Origin?

The idea that pathogens ought to evolve to become less virulent in their host species in order to optimise transmission rate - is old thinking and not particularly credible. Pathogens evolve to maximise their basic reproductive rate and this might be achieved with high virulence, low virulence or intermediate virulence. Which strategy is optimal depends on the dynamic interplay betwen pathogen and host populations and the external environment. Some pathogens (eg. baculoviruses) actually need to kill their hosts in order to be transmitted at all.

The potential benfits of a high virulence strategy for influenza viruses are not well understood. I wonder if the article is somewhat contradictary on this point: the 1918/19 flu virus complex clearly did evolve a high virulence strategy among one or more of its constituent members and, consequently (?), some members of the complex continue to persist to this day. Competition and cooperation via information exchange (= complex adaptive behaviour).

On another site, I have pondered whether a high virulence strategy helps the flu virus complex to persist and spread by limiting the verticle transmission of acquired immunity (mother to offspring) into the proceeding host generation?

ARR_309's post is very thought provoking, especially when we consider the virus as a complex adaptive system. The virus is a system that includes avian species, but it also includes the environment the avian species exist in. But, if the virus is succesful in avian hosts, why would it jump species at all?

Perhaps environmental pressure on avian species prompted the jump as an adaptation to that pressure. In the late 19th century and early 20th century avian species were under tremendous pressure, at least here in the US from market hunters, particularly passenger pidgeons and waterfowl. Waterfowl were being killed by the thousands on a nightly basis to supply restaurants on the eastern seaboard. It was big business. So, big in fact that an entirely new breed of dog (Chesapeake Bay Retriever) was developed to help market hunters collect the ducks that were killed in the bay. Today waterfowl are under pressure because of habitat lost to human developement.

So, for this virus to jump species when it's host species is under pressure makes sense. So, which species to jump to? The one that is succesfully pplying the pressure. Although, I agree that a jump would seem easier into swine than humans, were there enough swine (speaking of population density) in 1918 to pursue that route succesfully.?

I'm not saying this is true, but it does cause one to take a larger view of the virus/complex adaptive system.

Snick
 
Back
Top Bottom