Re: isolating cities
GSGS, yes there are plans and civilians are not privy to them.
After a little Google search of "protective sequestration", I belive you are exactly correct. This article from Michigan University explains how the study of 7 towns came about. Have we seen the big study of the 45 cities?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.medicineatmichigan.org/magazine/2007/spring/teamflu/default.asp
Team Flu Answers the Call
[snips]
But one call late on a Friday afternoon before the July 4 weekend in 2005 surprised even Markel ? it was from the Pentagon.
At the other end of the line was Cleto DiGiovanni Jr., M.D., of the Department of Defense?s Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA).
DiGiovanni needed medical historians who understood the social, scientific, as well as epidemiological contexts of pandemics. The staff of the U-M Center for the History of Medicine fit the bill precisely.
The agency was looking for evidence of the effectiveness of so-called non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPI) in slowing the spread and mitigating the damage of a devastating outbreak of infectious disease. These interventions included quarantine of those exposed to the illness; isolation of the infected; social distancing (i.e. closing schools and prohibiting public gatherings); wearing masks in public; frequent hand washing; and educating the public. Until adequate supplies of vaccine and antivirals became available, they would be the only arrows in the public health quiver.
DiGiovanni consulted with senior public health officials around the country who would ultimately use this kind of information, as well as key people in the disease containment areas at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
As it turned out,
the study DiGiovanni had in mind ? to define and identify provisional escape communities and document what they did ? required a team of historians.
Nevertheless, the concept of protective sequestration has caught on among many policy makers as a possible tool in the containment of a worst-case scenario pandemic of 1918-like proportions until enough vaccine could be produced and distributed to immunize a susceptible population.
The story of Team Flu hardly ends here. In June 2006, Markel received a call from Atlanta. This time it was Martin Cetron, M.D., director of the CDC Quarantine and Global Migration Division.
As a result, CDC hired Team Flu for a far more comprehensive project. ?They said, in effect, ?We really liked your methods, we really liked your results and conclusions, let?s do an even bigger study,?? says Stern, whose specialty is the development of local public health agencies.
?They wanted us to look at 45 of the most populous U.S. cities for which the data exist, in order to see what public health measures they implemented, the timing of those measures, who implemented them, and what compliance was.?
It was a good thing Team Flu already had a steep learning curve behind it ? the CDC wanted a preliminary report by December 2006 and a
final report by July 2007.
?In my career, this is the project that has entailed detailed analysis of the largest amount of paper, with the most manpower and the shortest turnaround time,? Markel says.
Typically, historians work alone, but this project is so mammoth that the center has become ?almost like a history laboratory,? says Stern.
?It?s collaboration in the truest sense of the word,? says Navarro, who is the project manager for the CDC study. ?We each have certain areas that we?ve become mini-experts on, so it?s doubly important that we?re able to pop into each other?s offices here at the center or discuss issues with our partners at the CDC.?
By December 2006, Team Flu had collected and processed data on all the communities in the study in consultation with a team of statisticians and epidemiologists at the CDC.
?But if you look at them (the cities) individually with very fine-grained statistical and qualitative analysis,? he quickly adds, ?you find that every city had a very different experience and not a few did surprisingly better than most of the others.?
Although data analysis is ongoing, the preliminary conclusions Team Flu is making on the utility of non-pharmaceutical interventions are striking. To begin, cities that applied NPIs earlier in the pandemic wave appeared to have lowered and delayed peak excess death rates; moreover, earlier non-pharmaceutical interventions implementation was associated with proportionately lower death rates than expected.
That this research is of such pressing interest to policy makers lends what Stern calls a frisson to the enterprise. It could have ramifications for how communities think about the implementation of public health strategies. ?There really is a sense of urgency that something needs to be generated so that Americans can be prepared,? she says.
Says Markel, ?Here you have the confluence of a group of scholars who are adept in studying the history of epidemics, the potential threat of a devastating flu pandemic, an extraordinary archive of NPI data from the last, most serious influenza pandemic (1918), and the need to come up with a policy of how to comfort such contagious challenges. This marriage of federal governmental agencies, policymakers, and the U-M Center for the History of Medicine has catapulted us to places we never expected to go. Perhaps this has become the greatest adventure of my career at Michigan because our work has proven to be of such critical importance to the nation?s health.?