Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
. 2024 Sep 10;121(37):e2404175121.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2404175121. Epub 2024 Sep 5. Structural and virologic mechanism of the emergence of resistance to Mpro inhibitors in SARS-CoV-2
Shin-Ichiro Hattori 1 , Haydar Bulut 2 , Hironori Hayashi 3 , Naoki Kishimoto 4 , Nobutoki Takamune 4 , Kazuya Hasegawa 5 , Yuri Furusawa 6 7 , Seiya Yamayoshi 6 7 8 , Kazutaka Murayama 9 , Hirokazu Tamamura 10 , Mi Li 11 12 , Alexander Wlodawer 11 , Yoshihiro Kawaoka 6 7 13 , Shogo Misumi 4 , Hiroaki Mitsuya 1 2 14
Affiliations
We generated SARS-CoV-2 variants resistant to three SARS-CoV-2 main protease (Mpro) inhibitors (nirmatrelvir, TKB245, and 5h), by propagating the ancestral SARS-CoV-2WK521WT in VeroE6TMPRSS2 cells with increasing concentrations of each inhibitor and examined their structural and virologic profiles. A predominant E166V-carrying variant (SARS-CoV-2WK521E166V), which emerged when passaged with nirmatrelvir and TKB245, proved to be resistant to the two inhibitors. A recombinant SARS-CoV-2E166V was resistant to nirmatrelvir and TKB245, but sensitive to 5h. X-ray structural study showed that the dimerization of Mpro was severely hindered by E166V substitution due to the disruption of the presumed dimerization-initiating Ser1'-Glu166 interactions. TKB245 stayed bound to MproE166V, whereas nirmatrelvir failed. Native mass spectrometry confirmed that nirmatrelvir and TKB245 promoted the dimerization of Mpro, and compromised the enzymatic activity; the Ki values of recombinant MproE166V for nirmatrelvir and TKB245 were 117±3 and 17.1±1.9 µM, respectively, indicating that TKB245 has a greater (by a factor of 6.8) binding affinity to MproE166V than nirmatrelvir. SARS-CoV-2WK521WT selected with 5h acquired A191T substitution in Mpro (SARS-CoV-2WK521A191T) and better replicated in the presence of 5h, than SARS-CoV-2WK521WT. However, no significant enzymatic or structural changes in MproA191T were observed. The replicability of SARS-CoV-2WK521E166V proved to be compromised compared to SARS-CoV-2WK521WT but predominated over SARS-CoV-2WK521WT in the presence of nirmatrelvir. The replicability of SARS-CoV-2WK521A191T surpassed that of SARS-CoV-2WK521WT in the absence of 5h, confirming that A191T confers enhanced viral fitness. The present data should shed light on the understanding of the mechanism of SARS-CoV-2's drug resistance acquisition and the development of resistance-repellant COVID-19 therapeutics.
Keywords: SARS-CoV-2; drug resistance; main protease.
. 2024 Sep 10;121(37):e2404175121.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2404175121. Epub 2024 Sep 5. Structural and virologic mechanism of the emergence of resistance to Mpro inhibitors in SARS-CoV-2
Shin-Ichiro Hattori 1 , Haydar Bulut 2 , Hironori Hayashi 3 , Naoki Kishimoto 4 , Nobutoki Takamune 4 , Kazuya Hasegawa 5 , Yuri Furusawa 6 7 , Seiya Yamayoshi 6 7 8 , Kazutaka Murayama 9 , Hirokazu Tamamura 10 , Mi Li 11 12 , Alexander Wlodawer 11 , Yoshihiro Kawaoka 6 7 13 , Shogo Misumi 4 , Hiroaki Mitsuya 1 2 14
Affiliations
- PMID: 39236245
- DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2404175121
We generated SARS-CoV-2 variants resistant to three SARS-CoV-2 main protease (Mpro) inhibitors (nirmatrelvir, TKB245, and 5h), by propagating the ancestral SARS-CoV-2WK521WT in VeroE6TMPRSS2 cells with increasing concentrations of each inhibitor and examined their structural and virologic profiles. A predominant E166V-carrying variant (SARS-CoV-2WK521E166V), which emerged when passaged with nirmatrelvir and TKB245, proved to be resistant to the two inhibitors. A recombinant SARS-CoV-2E166V was resistant to nirmatrelvir and TKB245, but sensitive to 5h. X-ray structural study showed that the dimerization of Mpro was severely hindered by E166V substitution due to the disruption of the presumed dimerization-initiating Ser1'-Glu166 interactions. TKB245 stayed bound to MproE166V, whereas nirmatrelvir failed. Native mass spectrometry confirmed that nirmatrelvir and TKB245 promoted the dimerization of Mpro, and compromised the enzymatic activity; the Ki values of recombinant MproE166V for nirmatrelvir and TKB245 were 117±3 and 17.1±1.9 µM, respectively, indicating that TKB245 has a greater (by a factor of 6.8) binding affinity to MproE166V than nirmatrelvir. SARS-CoV-2WK521WT selected with 5h acquired A191T substitution in Mpro (SARS-CoV-2WK521A191T) and better replicated in the presence of 5h, than SARS-CoV-2WK521WT. However, no significant enzymatic or structural changes in MproA191T were observed. The replicability of SARS-CoV-2WK521E166V proved to be compromised compared to SARS-CoV-2WK521WT but predominated over SARS-CoV-2WK521WT in the presence of nirmatrelvir. The replicability of SARS-CoV-2WK521A191T surpassed that of SARS-CoV-2WK521WT in the absence of 5h, confirming that A191T confers enhanced viral fitness. The present data should shed light on the understanding of the mechanism of SARS-CoV-2's drug resistance acquisition and the development of resistance-repellant COVID-19 therapeutics.
Keywords: SARS-CoV-2; drug resistance; main protease.