I posted this comment under the CDC news item, but thought I'd escalate it for action
Quote:
<table border="0" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" width="100%"> <tbody><tr> <td class="alt2" style="border: 1px inset ;">
I presume that A/Brisbane is the same strain that caused such a severe flu season in Australia. If 14 out of 19 specimens in the US were A/Brisbane, does this imply the US is going to have a severe flu season this year as well? Given that the current tri-valent vaccine did not include A/Brisbane, does this imply that those who received flu shots would not have protection against A/Brisbane? Could A/Brisbane also be behind some of what we are seeing in Egypt?
(Still trying to figure this stuff out)
Quote:
<table border="0" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" width="100%"> <tbody><tr> <td class="alt2" style="border: 1px inset ;">
Influenza A (H3) [19]
</td> </tr> </tbody></table> - Four viruses were characterized as A/Wisconsin/67/2005-like, the influenza A (H3) component of the 2007-08 influenza vaccine for the Northern Hemisphere.
- Fourteen viruses were characterized as A/Brisbane/10/2007-like. A/Brisbane/10/2007 is a recent antigenic variant which evolved from A/Wisconsin/67/2005-like. A/Brisbane/10/2007-like virus is the recommended influenza A (H3) component for the 2008 Southern Hemisphere vaccine.
- One virus showed somewhat reduced titers with antisera produced against A/Wisconsin/67/2005 and A/Brisbane/10/2007.
I presume that A/Brisbane is the same strain that caused such a severe flu season in Australia. If 14 out of 19 specimens in the US were A/Brisbane, does this imply the US is going to have a severe flu season this year as well? Given that the current tri-valent vaccine did not include A/Brisbane, does this imply that those who received flu shots would not have protection against A/Brisbane? Could A/Brisbane also be behind some of what we are seeing in Egypt?
(Still trying to figure this stuff out)
Comment