Check out the FAQ,Terms of Service & Disclaimers by clicking the
link. Please register
to be able to post. By viewing this site you are agreeing to our Terms of Service and Acknowledge our Disclaimers.
FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster.
The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website.
By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
New Zealand : Third of Kiwis ?immune? to swine flu
New Zealand : Third of Kiwis ?immune? to swine flu
Close to a third of New Zealanders were immune to swine flu by March this year, according to a major new scientific study.
The study commissioned by the Ministry of Health and conducted by Environmental Science and Research (ESR) estimated that of the 1.26 million people who were immune, about 480,000 people had some immunity prior to last year's pandemic wave, mostly in the older age groups.
Re: New Zealand : Third of Kiwis ?immune? to swine flu
Study shows full effect of Pandemic Influenza H1N1 in New Zealand in 2009
A major new scientific study, estimates that 1.26 million or 29% of New Zealanders were immune to the pandemic influenza virus by March this year. But a large proportion of the population remain vulnerable.
The Ministry commissioned study, conducted by ESR, estimates that of the 1.26 million people, about 480,000 people had some immunity prior to last year’s pandemic wave, mostly in the older age groups. An additional 780,000 were estimated to have been infected during 2009. The highest rate of infection during 2009 was in school age children - where one in three children were affected. Almost half of those infected showed no obvious symptoms.
“This study confirms that the Pandemic Influenza is able to spread rapidly through communities. One of the more interesting findings was that it was a sub-clinical illness (i.e. no symptoms) for almost half of those who were affected. For most people their symptoms were mild, however, for many it was a very serious illness requiring an admission to intensive care,” Dr Huang said.
Re: New Zealand : Third of Kiwis ?immune? to swine flu
Health officials are undertaking a major study to find out how many New Zealanders have had swine flu.
Scientists are trying to determine the level of immunity in the country to the H1-N1 virus, and plan to take blood samples from 2500 randomly chosen people.
Re: New Zealand : Third of Kiwis ?immune? to swine flu
Good fortune and old virus protected elderly from flu: study
Home ? News ? National
Fri, 4 Jun 2010
One of the scientists who found that 29.5 percent of the nation's population has some immunity to H1N1 swine flu says the new research helps explain why relatively few older people were infected.
"The elderly population of New Zealand was largely protected from the serious effects of last year's pandemic because of good fortune - previous influenza viruses, particularly from before 1957, gave them some protection," said Otago University Associate Professor Michael Baker, of Wellington.
About 12 percent of the population - 480,000 people - had some immunity before the swine flu epidemic even began in March last year: a lot of older people had apparently been exposed to a similar virus earlier in their lives and their immune systems "remembered" that.
But Prof Baker said the study also showed that younger people with certain health conditions, including pregnancy, were particularly vulnerable to serious illness and death from the virus and should consider getting a flu "jab".
Specific population groups such as children and Pacific Island and Maori people should also be targeted for vaccination.
An estimated 18 percent of the population caught the virus, with the highest rate of infection during 2009 in school age children -- where one in three children were affected. Virologists found that infection among school children was about 10 times higher than expected.
Almost half of the people infected showed no obvious symptoms.
Auckland University medical school head Professor John Fraser said this was one of the extraordinary features about the 2009 H1N1 influenza strain highlighted by the Environmental Science and Research study, which was commissioned by the Health Ministry.
It was "most extraordinary" that 45.2 percent of the positive tests were from people with no symptoms.
This was likely to be the main reason for the high infection rate, because people were transmitting the virus without knowing that they were infected.
Also unusual were the extremely high rate of infection in just a few months during the winter of 2009, and the fact that there were far fewer deaths than expected.
Prof Fraser said the key unanswered question remained to what degree the presence of antibodies in a person's blood sample necessarily indicated they had some protection from the virus.
Nearly half of all New Zealand children aged five-19 - the group most vulnerable to infection - now have antibodies to the 2009 H1N1 strain after only a single flu season.
"This substantial 'herd immunity' should slow the progress of future waves -- but only if those antibodies are protective," Professor Fraser said.
"People should not be complacent," he said, noting the other 50 percent of children remained at risk.
People should have a vaccination because that was the only way to ensure the community is well protected.
The "nightmare scenario" would be the return of a mutant strain with a similar transmission rate.
Comment