• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Why pandemic preparedness makes 'smart' economic sense

Commonground

Senior Moderator
28 September 2026

snip

OECD simulations using the Strategic Public Health Planning model for PPR assessed five outbreak scenarios, these being Ebola-like; avian influenza-like; influenza A-like coronavirus-like; and measles – like outbreaks, as a stress test for health systems and economies.

“When health systems are overwhelmed, economies stumble. Across all five outbreak scenarios, failure to mitigate outbreaks would result in sharp GDP contractions of between 2.7% in a coronavirus-like outbreak and 16.2% in a measles-like outbreak, on average, with the scale of damage varying across countries. Transport and storage, manufacturing and administrative and support services would consistently be amongst the hardest-hit sectors of the economy,” the report says.


The report argues that investment in PPR “is modest relative to the potential losses.” The report says that many countries have scaled back the funding available for strengthening their PPR capacity, with global PPR spending standing at $230 billion in 2022, dropping from its peak of $267 billion in 2021. “Health systems around the globe continue to face chronic workforce shortages and underinvestment in surveillance of emerging health threats,” the report warns.

snip

NPIs, which include physical distancing and ensuring safe travel, can be deployed promptly and adjusted when policy makers have “timely and accurate data on how an outbreak is unfolding.” The OECD adds that its analysis suggests that waste water surveillance can strengthen the protective impacts of NPIs and lockdown policies.

snip

The report also said the rising threat of zoonotic disease means efforts to capture PPR capacities need to go beyond focussing solely on human health. "Many emerging pathogens originate in animals and are amplified by land-use change, food production practices and environmental degradation," it said, warning that measurement should incorporate animal health surveillance, environmental monitoring and human-wildlife interactions to identify risks early and prevent outbreaks before they reach human populations.

more...

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top Bottom