• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

When is affect variability bad for health? The association between affect variability and immune response to the influenza vaccination

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Psychosom Res. 2018 Jan;104:41-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.11.002. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
[h=1]When is affect variability bad for health? The association between affect variability and immune response to the influenza vaccination.[/h] Jenkins BN[SUP]1[/SUP], Hunter JF[SUP]2[/SUP], Cross MP[SUP]3[/SUP], Acevedo AM[SUP]4[/SUP], Pressman SD[SUP]5[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]OBJECTIVES:[/h] This study addresses methodological and theoretical questions about the association between affect and physical health. Specifically, we examine the role of affect variability and its interaction with mean levels of affect to predict antibody (Ab) levels in response to an influenza vaccination.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] Participants (N=83) received the vaccination and completed daily diary measures of affect four times a day for 13days. At one and four months post-vaccination, blood was collected from the participants to assess Ab levels.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] Findings indicate that affect variability and its interaction with mean levels of affect predict an individual's immune response. Those high in mean positive affect (PA) who had more PA variability were more likely to have a lower Ab response in comparison to those who had high mean PA and less PA variability. Although it did not interact with mean negative affect (NA), NA variability on its own was associated with Ab response, whereby those with less NA variability mounted a more robust immune response.
[h=4]CONCLUSION:[/h] Affect variability is related to immune response to an influenza vaccination and, in some cases, interacts with mean levels of affect. These oscillations in affective experiences are critical to consider in order to unpack the intricacies of how affect influences health. These findings suggest that future researchers should consider the important role of affect variability on physical health-relevant outcomes as well as examine the moderating effect of mean affect levels.
Copyright ? 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Affect variability; Antibody response; Immune function; Negative affect; Positive affect

PMID: 29275784 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.11.002
 
Back
Top Bottom