• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Vet Rec . Vaccination of African penguins (Spheniscus demersus) against high-pathogenicity avian influenza

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Vet Rec


. 2023 Nov 27:e3616.
doi: 10.1002/vetr.3616. Online ahead of print. Vaccination of African penguins (Spheniscus demersus) against high-pathogenicity avian influenza

Laura Christl Roberts[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP], Darrell Abernethy[SUP] 3 4 [/SUP], David Gordon Roberts[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Katrin Ludynia[SUP] 5 6 [/SUP], Martha Magaretha O'Kennedy[SUP] 1 7 [/SUP], Celia Abolnik[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Background: High-pathogenicity avian influenza (HPAI) has become a conservation threat to wild birds. Therefore, suitable vaccine technology and practical application methods require investigation.
Methods: Twenty-four African penguins (Spheniscus demersus) were vaccinated with either a conventional inactivated clade 2.3.4.4b H5N8 HPAI whole virus or a tobacco leaf-produced H5 haemagglutinin-based virus-like particle (VLP). Six birds received a second dose of the inactivated vaccine. Antibody responses were assessed and compared by employing haemagglutination inhibition tests.
Results: A second dose of inactivated vaccine was required to induce antibody titres above the level required to suppress virus shedding, while a single dose of VLP vaccine produced these levels by day 14, and one bird still had antibodies on day 430.
Limitations: Bacterial contamination of the VLP vaccine limited the monitoring period and sample size in that treatment group, and it was not possible to perform a challenge study with field virus.
Conclusion: VLP vaccines offer a more practical option than inactivated whole viruses, especially in logistically challenging situations involving wild birds.


 
Back
Top Bottom