• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Vaccines (Basel) . Safety and Immunogenicity of a Novel Intranasal Influenza Vaccine (NasoVAX): A Phase 2 Randomized, Controlled Trial

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Vaccines (Basel)


. 2021 Mar 5;9(3):224.
doi: 10.3390/vaccines9030224.
Safety and Immunogenicity of a Novel Intranasal Influenza Vaccine (NasoVAX): A Phase 2 Randomized, Controlled Trial


Sybil Tasker[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Anna Wight O'Rourke[SUP] 1 3 [/SUP], Anvar Suyundikov[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Peta-Gay Jackson Booth[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Stephan Bart[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Vyjayanthi Krishnan[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jianfeng Zhang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Katie J Anderson[SUP] 1 5 [/SUP], Bertrand Georges[SUP] 1 [/SUP], M Scot Roberts[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Annual influenza vaccination greatly reduces morbidity and mortality, but effectiveness remains sub-optimal. Weaknesses of current vaccines include low effectiveness against mismatched strains, lack of mucosal and other effective tissue-resident immune responses, weak cellular immune responses, and insufficiently durable immune responses. The safety and immunogenicity of NasoVAX, a monovalent intranasal influenza vaccine based on a replication-deficient adenovirus type 5 platform, were evaluated in a placebo-controlled single ascending-dose study. Sixty healthy adults (18-49 years) received a single intranasal dose of 1?10[SUP]9[/SUP] viral particles (vp), 1 ? 10[SUP]10[/SUP] vp, or 1 ? 10[SUP]11[/SUP] vp of NasoVAX or placebo. NasoVAX was well-tolerated and elicited robust influenza-specific systemic and mucosal immune responses. The highest NasoVAX dose and the approved Fluzone[SUP]?[/SUP] influenza vaccine elicited comparable hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) geometric mean titers (152.8 vs. 293.4) and microneutralization (MN) geometric mean titers (142.5 vs. 162.8), with NasoVAX HAI titers maintained more than 1-year on average following a single dose. Hemagglutinin-specific T cells responses were also documented in peripheral mononuclear cell (PBMC) preparations. Consistent with the intranasal route of administration, NasoVAX elicited antigen-specific mucosal IgA responses in the nasopharyngeal cavity with an increase of approximately 2-fold over baseline GMT at the mid- and high-doses. In summary, NasoVAX appeared safe and elicited a broad immune response, including humoral, cellular, and mucosal immunity, with no impact of baseline anti-adenovirus antibody at the most immunogenic dose.

Keywords: NasoVAX; adenovirus vector; influenza vaccine; intranasal vaccine; mucosal immunity; pre-existing immunity.
 
Back
Top Bottom