• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Vaccines (Basel) . Epidemiological Differences in the Impact of COVID-19 Vaccination in the United States and China

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Vaccines (Basel)


. 2021 Mar 5;9(3):223.
doi: 10.3390/vaccines9030223.
Epidemiological Differences in the Impact of COVID-19 Vaccination in the United States and China


Monia Makhoul[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP], Hiam Chemaitelly[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Houssein H Ayoub[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Shaheen Seedat[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP], Laith J Abu-Raddad[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

This study forecasts Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination impact in two countries at different epidemic phases, the United States (US) and China. We assessed the impact of both a vaccine that prevents infection (VE[SUB]S[/SUB] of 95%) and a vaccine that prevents only disease (VE[SUB]P[/SUB] of 95%) through mathematical modeling. For VE[SUB]S[/SUB] of 95% and gradual easing of restrictions, vaccination in the US reduced the peak incidence of infection, disease, and death by >55% and cumulative incidence by >32% and in China by >77% and >65%, respectively. Nearly three vaccinations were needed to avert one infection in the US, but only one was needed in China. For VE[SUB]P[/SUB] of 95%, vaccination benefits were half those for VE[SUB]S[/SUB] of 95%. In both countries, impact of vaccination was substantially enhanced with rapid scale-up, vaccine coverage >50%, and slower or no easing of restrictions, particularly in the US. COVID-19 vaccination can flatten, delay, and/or prevent future epidemic waves. However, vaccine impact is destined to be heterogeneous across countries because of an underlying "epidemiologic inequity" that reduces benefits for countries already at high incidence, such as the US. Despite 95% efficacy, actual vaccine impact could be meager in such countries if vaccine scale-up is slow, acceptance is poor, or restrictions are eased prematurely.

Keywords: COVID-19; coronavirus; epidemiology; mathematical model; severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); vaccine.
 
Back
Top Bottom