• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Vaccine. Immunoinformatic comparison of T-cell epitopes contained in novel swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) virus with epitopes in 2008-2009 convention

Giuseppe

Emeritus
Vaccine. 2009 Aug 3. [Epub ahead of print]

Immunoinformatic comparison of T-cell epitopes contained in novel swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) virus with epitopes in 2008-2009 conventional influenza vaccine.

De Groot AS, Ardito M, McClaine E, Moise L, Martin B. - EpiVax, 146 Clifford Street, Providence, RI 02903, USA; Institute for Immunology and Informatics, University of Rhode Island, 80 Washington Street, Providence, RI 02903, USA; Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI 02903, USA.


In March 2009 a novel swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) virus (S-OIV) emerged in Mexico and the Western United States. Vaccination with conventional influenza vaccine (CIV) does not result in cross-reactive antibodies, however, the disproportionate number of cases (37%) occurring among persons younger than 50 years old suggested that adaptive immune memory might be responsible for the relative lack of virulence in older, healthy adults. Using EpiMatrix, a T-cell epitope prediction and comparison tool, we compared the sequences of the three hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA) proteins contained in 2008-2009 CIV to their counterparts in A/California/04/2009 (H1N1) looking for cross-conserved T-cell epitope sequences. We found greater than 50% conservation of T helper and CTL epitopes between novel S-OIV and CIV HA for selected HLA. Conservation was lower among NA epitopes. Sixteen promiscuous helper T-cell epitopes are contained in the S-OIV H1N1 HA sequence, of which nine (56%) were 100% conserved in the 2008-2009 influenza vaccine strain; 81% were either identical or had one conservative amino acid substitution. Fifty percent of predicted CTL epitopes found in S-OIV H1N1 HA were also found in CIV HA sequences. Based on historical performance, we expect these epitope predictions to be 93-99% accurate. This in silico analysis supports the proposition that T-cell response to cross-reactive T-cell epitopes, due to vaccination or exposure, may have the capacity to attenuate the course of S-OIV H1N1 induced disease-in the absence of cross-reactive antibody response. The value of the CIV or live-attenuated influenza vaccine containing the 2008-2009 vaccine strains, as defense against H1N1, could be further tested by evaluating human immune responses to the conserved T-cell epitopes using PBMC from individuals infected with H1N1 and from CIV vaccinees.

PMID: 19660593 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
-
------
 
Re: Vaccine. Immunoinformatic comparison of T-cell epitopes contained in novel swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) virus with epitopes in 2008-2009 conventional influenza vaccine.

This in silico analysis supports the proposition that T-cell response to cross-reactive T-cell epitopes, due to vaccination or exposure, may have the capacity to attenuate the course of S-OIV H1N1 induced disease-in the absence of cross-reactive antibody response.

Do I understand this correctly - that a seasonal 2008/2009 vaccine may offer some protection against swine H1N1, because it targets enough conserved epitopes, which can mount a defense in the absence of antibodies?

Might that explain the outcomes differences in healthy people?

Regarding....
.....adaptive immune memory might be responsible for the relative lack of virulence in older, healthy adults
This might be short lived, if you look at deaths in the subsequent waves of 1957 and 1918 - by January-March, deaths among elderly increased.

.
 
Re: Vaccine. Immunoinformatic comparison of T-cell epitopes contained in novel swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) virus with epitopes in 2008-2009 conventional influenza vaccine.

the seasonal (split-) vax goes into the muscle, not the
respiratory tract.
But T-cell protection is local, as I understand, inside the cells
in the tract.

So, maybe flumist protects ?

but then, why restrict to HA ?
Protection from PB1 should be bigger
 
Back
Top Bottom