• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Vaccine. Dose response effects of avian influenza (H7N7) vaccination of chickens: Serology, clinical protection and reduction of virus excretion.

Giuseppe

Emeritus
Vaccine. 2009 Jun 2;27(27):3592-7. Epub 2009 Apr 9.

Dose response effects of avian influenza (H7N7) vaccination of chickens: Serology, clinical protection and reduction of virus excretion.

Maas R, Tacken M, van Zoelen D, Oei H. Central Veterinary Institute of Wageningen UR, The Netherlands.

Knowledge of the relation between the antigen content of inactivated avian influenza (AI) vaccines, the serological response after vaccination and protection of vaccinated animals is important for the choice of optimal vaccines and vaccination regimes as well as for the assessment of criteria for the licensing of new AI-vaccines. We studied this relation in a dose response study using inactivated H7N7 avian influenza vaccines with varying antigen content. The serological response depended on the antigen content of the vaccines. Anti-AI antibodies were detected most frequently with ELISA, followed by the virus neutralisation test and the haemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay. Chickens with measurable HI-antibody titers, using homologous H7N7 antigen, were all protected against clinical disease after challenge with highly pathogenic A/chicken/Netherlands/621557/03 H7N7 virus. However, in these chickens high levels of virus could still be present on days 2-4 after challenge. The reduction of virus titers after challenge, depended on the antigen content of the vaccines as well as on the serum antibody titers. While 10 haemagglutinating units (HAU), equivalent to 0.8mug haemagglutinin (HA) protein, per vaccine dose was sufficient for prevention of clinical disease, 128 HAU (9mug HA) per dose was required for reduction of virus titers in all chickens to 10(3) egg-infectious dose 50% (EID(50)) or less. In order to reduce virus titers below 10(3)EID(50) per swab a HI-antibody titer of 64 was required. After use of the vaccine with the highest antigen content, challenge still induced a booster of antibody titers which is indicative of replication of challenge virus.

PMID: 19464539 [PubMed - in process]
-
------
 
Back
Top Bottom