• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Vaccine . Cost-effectiveness of dual influenza and pneumococcal vaccination among the elderly in Shenzhen, China

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Vaccine


. 2021 Mar 20;S0264-410X(21)00324-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.03.041. Online ahead of print.
Cost-effectiveness of dual influenza and pneumococcal vaccination among the elderly in Shenzhen, China


Daqin Chen[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Zhaojia Ye[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Zhenfei Pi[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Satoshi Mizukami[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Kiyoshi Aoyagi[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Yawen Jiang[SUP] 6 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Objective: To assess the cost-effectiveness of dual influenza and pneumococcal vaccination for the elderly in Shenzhen, China.
Methods: A Markov state-transition model with a weekly cycle was developed to compare the outcomes of dual influenza and pneumococcal vaccination for the prevention of influenza and pneumococcal infections compared with no vaccination among 70-74 years old people in Shenzhen over 5 years. The model allowed seasonal variation of influenza activity. We calculated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) with costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) discounted at 5% annually from the societal perspective. The impact of parameter uncertainty on the results was examined using one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA).
Results: In the base case, dual vaccination prevented 5042 influenza infections, 26 IPD cases, 3 disabilities, 34 deaths, and cost US$7.1 per person while resulting in a net gain of 0.0026 QALYs compared with no vaccination. Using once the Chinese gross domestic product per capita in 2019 (US$10,289) as the willingness-to-pay threshold, dual vaccination was cost-effective with an ICER of US$2699 per QALY gained. One-way sensitivity analyses showed that the ICER was relatively sensitive to changes in influenza attack rates and influenza vaccine effectiveness. Based on the results of PSA with 1000 Monte Carlo simulations, receiving both vaccines was cost-effective in 100% of the repetitions.
Conclusion: The current study provides evidence that dual influenza and pneumococcal vaccination is a cost-effective disease prevention strategy for the elderly in Shenzhen, China.

Keywords: Cost-effectiveness; Influenza; Markov model; Pneumonia; Vaccine.
 
Back
Top Bottom