• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Using Active Choice Within the Electronic Health Record to Increase Influenza Vaccination Rates

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Mar 23. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4046-6. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Using Active Choice Within the Electronic Health Record to Increase Influenza Vaccination Rates.[/h] Patel MS[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2,[/SUP][SUP]3,[/SUP][SUP]4,[/SUP][SUP]5[/SUP], Volpp KG[SUP]6,[/SUP][SUP]7,[/SUP][SUP]8,[/SUP][SUP]9,[/SUP][SUP]10[/SUP], Small DS[SUP]7[/SUP], Wynne C[SUP]6[/SUP], Zhu J[SUP]6,[/SUP][SUP]9[/SUP], Yang L[SUP]6[/SUP], Honeywell S Jr[SUP]6[/SUP], Day SC[SUP]6[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]BACKGROUND:[/h] Despite the benefits of influenza vaccination, each year more than half of adults in the United States do not receive it.
[h=4]OBJECTIVE:[/h] To evaluate the association between an active choice intervention in the electronic health record (EHR) and changes in influenza vaccination rates.
[h=4]DESIGN:[/h] Observational study.
[h=4]PATIENTS:[/h] Adults eligible for influenza vaccination with a clinic visit at one of three internal medicine practices at the University of Pennsylvania Health System between September 2010 and March 2013.
[h=4]INTERVENTION:[/h] The EHR confirmed patient eligibility during the clinic visit and, upon accessing the patient chart, prompted the physician and their medical assistant to actively choose to "accept" or "cancel" an order for the influenza vaccine.
[h=4]MAIN MEASURES:[/h] Change in influenza vaccination order rates at the intervention practice compared to two control practices for the 2012-2013 flu season, comparing trends during the prior two flu seasons adjusting for time trends and patient and clinic visit characteristics.
[h=4]KEY RESULTS:[/h] The sample (n = 45,926 patients) was 62.9% female, 35.9% white, and 54.4% black, with a mean age of 50.2 years. Trends were similar between practices during the 2 years in the pre-intervention period. Vaccination rates increased in both groups in the post-intervention year, but the intervention practice using active choice had a significantly greater increase than the control (adjusted difference-in-difference: 6.6 percentage points; 95% CI, 5.1-8.1; P < 0.001), representing a 37.3% relative increase compared to the pre-intervention period. More than 99.9% (9938/9941) of orders placed during the study period resulted in vaccination.
[h=4]CONCLUSIONS:[/h] Active choice through the EHR was associated with a significant increase in influenza vaccination rates.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] active choice; behavioral economics; choice architecture; electronic health record; influenza vaccination; nudge; physician behavior

PMID: 28337690 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-017-4046-6
 
Back
Top Bottom