• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Use of Inhaled Corticosteroids in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and the Risk of Tuberculosis and Influenza: A Systematic Review

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Chest. 2014 Feb 6. doi: 10.1378/chest.13-2137. [Epub ahead of print]
Use of Inhaled Corticosteroids in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and the Risk of Tuberculosis and Influenza: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Dong YH, Chang CH, Wu FL, Shen LJ, Calverley PM, L?fdahl CG, Lai MS, Mahler DA.
Abstract
ABSTRACT BACKGROUND:

The use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) is associated with an increased risk of pneumonia in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, the risks on other respiratory infections such as tuberculosis and influenza remained unclear.
METHODS:

By comprehensive literature searching of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to July 2013, we identified randomized controlled trials of ICS lasting at least six months. We conducted meta-analyses by the Peto, Mantel-Haenszel, and Bayesian approaches to generate summary estimates comparing ICS treatment versus non-ICS treatment for the risk of tuberculosis and influenza.
RESULTS:

Twenty-five trials (22,898 subjects) for tuberculosis and 26 trials (23,616 subjects) for influenza were included. ICS treatment was associated with a significantly higher risk of tuberculosis (Peto OR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.04-5.03) but was not associated with a significantly increased risk of influenza (Peto OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.94-1.63) versus non-ICS treatment. Results were similar with each meta-analytic approach. Furthermore, the number needed-to-harm (NNH) to cause one additional tuberculosis event was lower for patients in endemic areas (NNH=909), as compared with those in non-endemic areas (NNH=1,667), if treating COPD patients by ICS.
CONCLUSIONS:

Our study raises the safety concerns about the risk of tuberculosis and influenza associated with ICS use in COPD patients which deserve further investigation.

PMID:
24504044
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24504044
 
Back
Top Bottom