Emily
Editor, Senior Moderator
Re: Disease suspected in mass die-offs of starfish (sea star wasting syndrome), along North American coastlines
Re: Disease suspected in mass die-offs of starfish (sea star wasting syndrome), along North American coastlines
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4024922/
And it seems to already be happening...
http://patriotadventures.blogspot.com/2014/07/chuckanut-island.html
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/scientists-zero-whats-causing-starfish-die-offs/
Re: Disease suspected in mass die-offs of starfish (sea star wasting syndrome), along North American coastlines
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4024922/
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. May 13, 2014; 111(19): 6855.
Published online May 13, 2014. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1404650111
PMCID: PMC4024922
Sea star wasting
Mark Schrope, Science Writer
In June of last year, researchers got the first report that sea stars in Washington?s Olympic National Park were succumbing to a new disease outbreak. By August, stars were falling off the rocks?dead by the thousands?at Vancouver Island. ?That?s the point at which we started getting samples and alerting people,? says Drew Harvell, a marine epidemiologist at Cornell University in Ithaca, New York, who is part of a team now sleuthing the outbreak?s cause. ?We?re looking, but it?s hard to figure out what?s going on.?
The still-mysterious condition effectively deflates the animals, causing growing lesions that break their bodies apart. Reports of further losses from the disease, which has all but eradicated multiple sea star species in certain spots, now stretch from Alaska to Mexico. It has been called ?sea star wasting syndrome? because some of the signs resemble those of conditions seen before on both North American coasts. However, this may be a misnomer, as the ongoing event has a number of characteristics distinguishing it from past known outbreaks.
Rather than a wasting them away, the condition can progress quite rapidly, even in very healthy animals. Although typical outbreaks affect a single species and end with the onset of winter, the current outbreak is hammering at least a dozen species and still going strong as spring approaches.
Harvell is currently on sabbatical at the University of Washington?s Friday Harbor Laboratories. She is working with Ian Hewson, a microbiologist at Cornell, and other colleagues, to collect and process samples in hopes of understanding what is happening. The condition is likely infectious, but they can?t yet identify the transmission route. This identification is always a challenge, but particularly in marine research, where resources are more limited than for human epidemiology.
...
Harvell says it?s too soon to say what the ecological implications of such a large loss will be. However, she points out that one of the species hit hardest, the ochre star, was the focus of the seminal paper that introduced the term ?keystone species,? a species whose populations keeps others in check. The ochres are especially important in keeping mussel populations from overtaking rocky habitats, and all of the species affected are predatory. ?There?s just no question there?s going to be a huge impacts for the subtidal seascape,? says Harvell, ?An event this large will probably have a big impact on their population biology.?...
And it seems to already be happening...
http://patriotadventures.blogspot.com/2014/07/chuckanut-island.html
Sunday, July 13, 2014
Chuckanut Island
...We landed on a nice little sandbar of the south end of the island, but the the whole place felt felt a bit "off". On all of our past visits, it had felt very inviting and full of life, but this time there seemed to be much less biodiversity and the island felt a bit foreboding. Our best guess as to what might have changed is that the island could have been hit with sea-star wasting disease. There were far fewer sea stars than we had remembered (we could only find about 12 on the whole island) and areas that had previously been bare rock and algae were covered in mats of young mussels and barnacles. We thought that this could indicate a huge reduction in sea star population due to disease, and a subsequent ecosystem destabilization. Hopefully we're wrong and I was just mis-remembering....
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/scientists-zero-whats-causing-starfish-die-offs/
Scientists zero in on what?s causing starfish die-offs
BY Ashley Ahearn, EarthFix and Katie Campbell, Earthfix June 17, 2014 at 4:43 PM EDT
...
Scientists believe the pathogen spread through the water, as well as via physical contact (starfish often clump together). Another hypothesis is that the pathogen could also be concentrating in the mussels and clams that starfish like to eat.
...
At the University of California Santa Barbara Aquarium, captive sea stars started showing signs of the syndrome at the same time as their wild counterparts who live on the rocks several hundred feet from the tanks. The captive sea stars are kept in tanks of filtered seawater. In one tank they were fed mussels harvested from the rocks outside. In another tank the sea stars were fed frozen squid.
The animals that ate frozen squid stayed healthy, while the sea stars that ate the wild-harvested mussels contracted the syndrome. Blanchette cautions that these observations are purely anecdotal and the sample size is very small, but she believes this hypothesis merits further study....