• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

UK swine flu coverage was "balanced"

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
The media have been accused of ?over-hyping? the 2009 influenza A/H1N1 (swine flu) pandemic, emphasising the risks of the illness to make a news story more interesting. However, UK newspapers' coverage of the pandemic was generally ?measured? and ?responsible?, according to a quantitative analysis published this week in the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.

This contrasts to earlier public health scares in the UK, such as fears over a possible link between autism and the MMR vaccine, where misrepresentation of the scientific debate and an undue focus on anecdotal evidence meant that public perception of the danger was heightened.

?The news media's role as a disseminator of scientific information is particularly important in areas of risk perception,? write Shona Hilton and Kate Hunt, of the UK Medical Research Council?s Unit of Social and Public Health Sciences in Glasgow,. ?Despite a succession of health scares in recent years in which the media has been accused of exaggerating the risks and contributing to public misunderstandings of the issues, this analysis suggests that the UK newsprint reporting of swine flu in the 2009?10 outbreak was largely measured.?

...

http://www.eht-forum.org/news.html?fileId=news101210082622&from=home&id=0
 
Back
Top