• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Toward more specific and transparent research and development costs: The case of seasonal influenza vaccines

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Vaccine. 2013 Jul 3. pii: S0264-410X(13)00847-5. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.06.055. [Epub ahead of print]
Toward more specific and transparent research and development costs: The case of seasonal influenza vaccines.
Chit A, Parker J, Halperin SA, Papadimitropoulos M, Krahn M, Grootendorst P.
Source

University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; GlaxoSmithKline, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: Ayman.Chit@utoronto.ca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:

The ability to calculate the development costs for specific medicines and vaccines is important to inform investments in innovation. Unfortunately, the literature is predominated by non-reproducible studies only measuring aggregate level drug research and development (R&D) costs. We describe methodology that improves the transparency and reproducibility of primary indication expected R&D expenditures.
METHODS:

We used publically accessible clinical trial data to investigate the fate of all seasonal influenza vaccine candidates that entered clinical development post year 2000. We calculated development times and probabilities of success for these candidates through the various phases of clinical development. Clinical trial cost data obtained from university based clinical researchers were used to estimate the costs of each phase of development. The cost of preclinical development was estimated using published literature.
RESULTS:

A vaccine candidate entering pre-clinical development in 2011 would be expected to achieve licensure in 2022; all costs are reported in 2022 Canadian dollars (CAD). After applying a 9% cost of capital, the capitalized total pre tax R&D expenditure amounts to $474.88 million CAD.
CONCLUSION:

Clinical development costs for vaccines and drugs can be estimated with increased specificity and transparency using public sources of data. The robustness of these estimates will only increase over time due to public disclosure incentives first introduced in the late 1990s. However, preclinical development costs remain difficult to estimate from public data.

Copyright ? 2013. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
KEYWORDS:

Biologic, Clinical trial, Cost, Drug development, Economics, Influenza, Research and development, Risk, Vaccine

PMID:
23830976
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23830976
 
Back
Top Bottom