• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Timeliness of signal detection for adverse events following influenza vaccination in young children: a simulation case study

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 1;10(2):e031851. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031851. [h=1]Timeliness of signal detection for adverse events following influenza vaccination in young children: a simulation case study.[/h]
Jacoby P[SUP]1[/SUP], Glover C[SUP]2[/SUP], Damon C[SUP]2[/SUP], Fathima P[SUP]3[/SUP], Pillsbury A[SUP]2[/SUP], Durrheim D[SUP]4[/SUP], Gold MS[SUP]5[/SUP], Leeb A[SUP]6,[/SUP][SUP]7[/SUP], Snelling T[SUP]3,[/SUP][SUP]8[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]OBJECTIVES:[/h] To determine how soon after commencement of the seasonal influenza vaccination programme, the AusVaxSafety active vaccine safety surveillance system, currently in use across Australia, would have detected a safety signal had it been operating in 2010 when there was an unprecedented number of febrile seizures in young children associated with one specific influenza vaccine brand, Fluvax (CSL Biotherapies).
[h=4]DESIGN:[/h] Simulation study.
[h=4]SETTING:[/h] Western Australian vaccine influenza coverage and adverse event surveillance data.
[h=4]OUTCOME MEASURES:[/h] Simulated solicited responses from caregivers who would have received an SMS survey about adverse events experienced following seasonal influenza vaccination of their children aged 6 months to <5 years.
[h=4]PARTICIPANTS:[/h] None.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] We estimated a >90% probability of a safety signal being detected by AusVaxSafety based on solicited reports for either fever or medical attendance at or before the week ending 28 March 2010, 3 weeks after the start of vaccine distribution. Suspension of the national paediatric influenza vaccination programme as a result of the passive adverse events surveillance operating at the time did not occur until 23 April 2010.
[h=4]CONCLUSIONS:[/h] Active vaccine safety surveillance leading to rapid detection of a safety signal would likely have resulted in earlier suspension of Fluvax from the vaccination programme, prevention of many febrile convulsions and maintenance of public confidence in influenza vaccination for young children.
? Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] adverse events; paediatric infectious disease & immunisation; statistics & research methods

PMID: 32122906 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031851
Free full text
 
Back
Top Bottom