• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

The Lancet. Safety and efficacy of the RTS,S/AS01E candidate malaria vaccine given with expanded-programme-on-immunisation vaccines: 19 month follow-u

Giuseppe

Emeritus
[Source: The Lancet, full text: (LINK). Abstract, edited.]


The Lancet Infectious Diseases, Early Online Publication, 21 July 2011
doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70100-1
Cite or Link Using DOI
Safety and efficacy of the RTS,S/AS01E candidate malaria vaccine given with expanded-programme-on-immunisation vaccines: 19 month follow-up of a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial



Original Text

Dr Kwaku Poku Asante MD, Salim Abdulla MD, Selidji Agnandji MD, John Lyimo MD, Johan Vekemans MD, Solange Soulanoudjingar MD, Ruth Owusu MD, Mwanajaa Shomari BSc, Amanda Leach MRCPCH, Erik Jongert PhD, Nahya Salim MD, Jose F Fernandes MD, David Dosoo BSc, Maria Chikawe MD, Saadou Issifou MD, Kingsley Osei-Kwakye MD, Marc Lievens MSc, Maria Paricek MD, Tina M?ller MD candidate, Stephen Apanga MD, Grace Mwangoka MSc, Marie-Claude Dubois MSc, Tigani Madi MD, Evans Kwara MD, Rose Minja CO, Aurore B Hounkpatin MD, Owusu Boahen MPH, Kingsley Kayan Dip Med Lab Tech, George Adjei MSc, Daniel Chandramohan MD, Terrell Carter MHS, Preeti Vansadia MHS, Marla Sillman MHS, Barbara Savarese RN, Christian Loucq MD, Didier Lapierre MD, Brian Greenwood, Joe Cohen PhD, Peter Kremsner FRCP, Seth Owusu-Agyei PhD, Marcel Tanner PhD, Bertrand Lell MD



Summary

Background

The RTS,S/AS01E candidate malaria vaccine is being developed for immunisation of infants in Africa through the expanded programme on immunisation (EPI). 8 month follow-up data have been reported for safety and immunogenicity of RTS,S/AS01E when integrated into the EPI. We report extended follow-up to 19 months, including efficacy results.


Methods

We did a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial of safety and efficacy of the RTS,S/AS01E candidate malaria vaccine given with EPI vaccines between April 30, 2007, and Oct 7, 2009, in Ghana, Tanzania, and Gabon. Eligible children were 6?10 weeks of age at first vaccination, without serious acute or chronic illness. All children received the EPI diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis (inactivated whole-cell), and hepatitis-B vaccines, Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine, and oral polio vaccine at study months 0, 1, and 2, and measles vaccine and yellow fever vaccines at study month 7. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive three doses of RTS,S/AS01E at 6, 10, and 14 weeks (0, 1, 2 month schedule) or at 6 weeks, 10 weeks, and 9 months (0, 2, 7 month schedule) or placebo. Randomisation was according to a predefined block list with a computer-generated randomisation code. Detection of serious adverse events and malaria was by passive case detection. Antibodies against Plasmodium falciparum circumsporozoite protein and HBsAg were monitored for 19 months. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00436007.


Findings

511 children were enrolled. Serious adverse events occurred in 57 participants in the RTS,S/AS01E 0, 1, 2 month group (34%, 95% CI 27?41), 47 in the 0, 1, 7 month group (28%, 21?35), and 49 (29%, 22?36) in the control group; none were judged to be related to study vaccination. At month 19, anticircumsporozoite immune responses were significantly higher in the RTS,S/AS01E groups than in the control group. Vaccine efficacy for the 0, 1, 2 month schedule (2 weeks after dose three to month 19, site-adjusted according-to-protocol analysis) was 53% (95% CI 26?70; p=0?0012) against first malaria episodes and 59% (36?74; p=0?0001) against all malaria episodes. For the entire study period, (total vaccinated cohort) vaccine efficacy against all malaria episodes was higher with the 0, 1, 2 month schedule (57%, 95% CI 33?73; p=0?0002) than with the 0, 1, 7 month schedule (32% CI 16?45; p=0?0003). 1 year after dose three, vaccine efficacy against first malaria episodes was similar for both schedules (0, 1, 2 month group, 61?6% [95% CI 35?6?77?1], p<0?001; 0, 1, 7 month group, 63?8% [40?4?78?0], p<0?001, according-to-protocol cohort).


Interpretation

Vaccine efficacy was consistent with the target put forward by the WHO-sponsored malaria vaccine technology roadmap for a first-generation malaria vaccine. The 0, 1, 2 month vaccine schedule has been selected for phase 3 candidate vaccine assessment.


Funding
Program for Appropriate Technology in Health Malaria Vaccine Initiative; GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals.
- --------
 
Back
Top Bottom